View more on these topics

Pension transfer loan was form of liberation, court rules


A court has ruled that a loan taken out to fund investments as part of a pension transfer was a form of pension liberation and should be subject to tax.

Richard White had accrued pension rights under British Airways’ final salary scheme when he looked in to transfering into a Sipp in 2010 in order to invest in a company called Imperium Enterprises.

Against advice from an IFA, White confirmed he wanted to transfer, but after opting out of the BA scheme, the consulting actuary firm he planned make the Sipp investments through said that it now had reservations about Imperium.

Two days later, White transferred £515,794 into a Sipp provided by Pilgrim Trustee Services, but also contacted Rowanmoor around the same time saying he wished to invest £520,000 in a Sipp and would like some of that to be invested in Imperium.

Rowanmoor expressed its concern that Imperium was allowed to make loans that would contravene Sipp regulations, and received an undertaking from White that he would “not be receiving a loan from Imperium Enterprises Ltd or any company…associated with them”.

White then signed a loan agreement on 26 October for “£75,000 on an interest only basis and the capital will be paid from the proceeds of your pension fund.”

HMRC opened an enquiry in 2012, and levied a £30,000 unauthorised payment charge on White which he appealed at the Tribunal.

The First Tier Tribunal has sided with HM Revenue & Customs

Judge Thomas Scott says in his ruling: “I find that the loan was a ‘payment’ for the purposes of [the legislation] and that it was made in connection with the investment by the Rowanmoor Sipp in Imperium, which was an investment acquired using sums held for the purposes of a registered pension scheme…The appeal is therefore dismissed.”

Technical Connection head of pensions strategy Claire Trott says: “This is just one way that funds are extracted from a pension before age 55 and it can be clearly seen that this isn’t acceptable as the investment is dependent on the loans being repaid. It seems to be the could have been a vicious circle because they plan was to use pension benefits to repay the loan and the money repaid to the loan to pay pension benefits. If a significant amount of people defaulted then there would be nothing in the investment to pay the benefits.”



Tax break for self-employed costs extra £2bn

The cost of a tax break for the self-employed is set to cost the Treasury an additional £2bn following the move to a flat rate state pension. The Financial Times reports for the year to April 2017, the Treasury estimate of the cost of reduced national insurance contributions for the self-employed has gone up by […]


Apfa calls on FCA to drop Mifid II call recording rules

Apfa is urging the FCA not to “gold-plate” the telephone recording requirements in Mifid II because the measure is disproportionate for the adviser market. Apfa was responding to the FCA’s third Mifid II consultation paper, published in September, which included the suggestion to extend the recording requirement to all “Article 3” firms, which includes financial advice firms […]


Why aren’t restricted firms cheaper than IFAs?

Restricted advice is not cheaper than independent. That is, at least, according to the FCA. “We did not observe any material variation in charges between restricted and independent advice” was the regulator’s ruling in its recent data bulletin. Combined with high-profile examples of restricted firm fees, such as Standard Life’s national 1825 charging 4 per […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. A fool and his money………….!

  2. Rowenmoore should never have let this go ahead and in future should realise that a personal undertaking is clearly not worth the paper its written on. It an investment potentially allows for the possibility of unauthorised withdrawals then it should not be an acceptable investment for the SIPP. Product providers, platforms and SIPPs really need to examine their asset universe more closely and apply the constraints necessary to run a compliant proposition.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm