View more on these topics

Pension tax relief goes begging for low-paid workers

Around 1.75 million low-paid and part-time workers could be missing out on pension tax relief, half a million more than previously thought, according to new data.

Royal London has estimated that £60m is being given up by the workers caught between the threshold for automatic enrolment in a pension scheme – £10,000 – and the income tax threshold – £12,500 a year.

The provider notes that while workers in group personal pensions will benefit from “relief at source” calculations, most trust-based occupational pension schemes and public service pension schemes do not facilitate pension tax relief to those under the income tax threshold.

Previous estimates from the Low Income Tax reform group put the number of affected workers at 1.22 million for 2015/16.

A Freedom of Information Act request from Royal London asked HM Revenue and Customs for further information on 2016/17 figures, finding the number had risen to 1.33m.

What future for pension tax relief?

However, Royal London notes that the additional 110,000 workers caught occured as the personal tax allowance rose only £400 from £10,600 to £11,000 in 2016/17.

Not only has automatic enrolment been rolled out to more workers now, but the personal tax allowance has also risen by another £1,500 to £12,500.

If the £400 increase in allowance added 110,000 to the number of individuals affected, Royal London projects that another £1,500 increase would results in an impact nearly four times as great, adding 412,500 workers.

The result is that by 2019/20, 1.75 million low-paid workers could miss out on pension tax relief due to the way their schemes are set up.

The figure for £60m forgone comes from ministers telling a Department for Work and Pensions select committee last week that the average worker affected by this trap loses £35 a year.

Royal London director of policy Steve Webb: “It is a scandal that so many low-paid and part-time workers are missing out on tax relief on their pension contributions.  This is the group that most needs a boost to their pension savings.  These new figures suggest that the scale of the problem is much bigger than previously thought.  It is simply not good enough for ministers to say that it is not cost-effective to deal with this problem.”

Recommended

Wealth manager acquires Bedfordshire IFA

Wealth manager Lumin Wealth Management has acquired Bedfordshire-based IFA Hyperion Financial Planning with £85m of client funds under advice in a bid to become “an alternative to the national consolidators”. Two Hyperion advisers as well as a senior paraplanner will move as part of the acquisition. Hyperion director Michael Barnett says: “Throughout the process of […]

Money and umbrella - thumbnail
21

FCA to grant firms PI flexibility after FOS limit increase

The FCA will consider the individual circumstances for advice firms who cannot get their personal indemnity insurance re-confirmed before the 1 April increase in the maximum compensation limit for Financial Ombudsman Service claims, Money Marketing has been told. Monday will see an increase in the FOS’s limit from £150,000 to £350,000. Confirmation of the changes […]

20

UFPLS vs flexi-access drawdown: drawdown wins by a country mile

If there is a straight choice between flexi-access pension drawdown and uncrystallised funds pension lump sum, flexi-access wins by a country mile in virtually every situation. The Treasury prefers to pronounce UFPLS as “uffplus”, presumably because the plus syllable lends a positive quality to this otherwise ridiculous expression. Most pension professionals prefer to pronounce it […]

Converting pension savings to a retirement income…

Since last year’s reforms to pension legislation, a significant number of retirees have chosen income drawdown over purchasing an annuity. Income drawdown is more flexible than an annuity. However, it also increases the likelihood that individuals won’t be able to maintain their income throughout their lifetime. In this short video, we explain the risks that […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Michael Johnson 8th April 2019 at 4:18 pm

    Today, low earners in multiple jobs are AE-ineligible, missing out on employer contributions and tax relief on their own contributions. This injustice would be rectify by scrapping AE’s £10,000 minimum earnings threshold because the proposed bonuses would be paid irrespective of tax-paying status (as per the Lifetime ISA today). Today’s inability to aggregate earnings from multiple jobs (for tax relief purposes) would become irrelevant, and those with total earnings even below the Personal Allowance (£12,500) would, in future, receive an incentive to save.

    In addition, low earning members of “net pay” workplace schemes would no longer miss out on a saving incentive (tax relief having disappeared). Very simple.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com