View more on these topics

Pension liberation scheme lands payday lenders with ban

The Insolvency Service has banned three payday loan directors for using pension liberation money to pay off the company’s debt.

Speed-e-Loans.com directors Philip Miller, Robert Alan Davies, and Daniel Jonathan Miller have been banned for nine, six and five years respectively.

Their misconduct caused the loss of over £1.2m investors’ money.

In July 2012, the firm’s managing director was suspended. The following month the firm acquired a new director, but stopped lending to new clients.

In order to access new funds, Philip Miller, also major firm’s shareholder, suggested to the board receive funds from a pensions liberation scheme set up by third party brokers.

The board agreed that investors would have a “guaranteed” annual dividend payments of 5 per cent and a return of the whole of their investment in ten years.

In exchange, Speed-e-Loans would receive 54 per cent of the money provided by the public and was contractually obliged to repay 100 per cent plus that annual 5 per cent dividend.

Over £2.6m was invested in the scheme and over £1.2m didn’t go into trading but into Speed-e-Loans’ account to repair the balance sheet.

Speed-e-Loans continued to receive investment through May 2013 despite one of the brokers responsible for the scheme going on trial for fraud.

Following media coverage around such schemes, the following month Speed-e-Loans sought advice and went into administration.

At administration, the company had liabilities of more than £4.3m and total listed assets of £150,269.

Insolvency Service chief investigator Cheryl Lambert says the directors were “recklessly negligent in their desperation to save the company”.

He says: “None of them asked simple, obvious questions when it should have been clear to them the brokers were taking nearly 50 per cent in fees, nor the type of scheme they had become involved with and the individuals who were pushing the scheme.

“Philip Miller, the proposer and principal character, stood to gain financially from the transactions through a commission and so his actions demand the harshest criticism.

“Taking action against the people most responsible is a warning to all directors that such behaviour will attract in a very significant sanction. You cannot hide behind a lack of technical knowledge of specialist schemes – you have to exercise independent and critical thought.”

Recommended

Pig thumbnail
1

Pension liberation complaints to Ombudsman service fall

Pension liberation complaints to The Pensions Ombudsman dropped significantly last year. In 2015/16 pension liberation – where companies fraudulently promise tax free access to pension cash before age 55 by transferring into a new scheme – was the most common type of complaint to TPO, accounting for 16 per cent of all new cases. This […]

4

Sipp scheme cleared over pension liberation allegations

A court has ruled that Sipp scheme operator Sippchoice should not pay sanction charges after HM Revenue & Customs claimed it was used as a pension liberation vehicle. HMRC claimed Sippchoice allowed members to invest their funds in Imperium Enterprises and then enabled them to access them in the form of loans before the age […]

UK-Currency-Money-Pound-GBP-620x413.jpg
1

High Court winds up £3m Ucis pension liberation scam

A Preston-based pension liberation scheme with more than £3m of investments has been wound up following an Insolvency Service investigation. Thames Trustees convinced customers to move their pension fund into the Westminster Pension Scheme by promising a cash payment or commission on investments. In reality, Westminster was a pension liberation scheme and gave clients illegal […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Okay, what’s the ‘significant sanction’ then? – because I can’t see it mentioned here.

    Or are they suggesting that it’s these ‘bans’. No doubt, their ‘wives’ will soon be opening up new companies’ (Popplewell style) and everything will be business as usual.

    Another example of the UK’s pathetic regulatory processes

  2. We have only just found out about this ,,,,as my partner transferd his pension to speed e cash which was finalized on 06/02/13 , we decided to check up on our investment which is all we have that is our life, our kids inheritance everything ! and need help/advice pleace is there anything we can do to get our £34,195,03 back , i realize this is not really a comment but do not know where to turn, my partner has been ill for the last year so this really is all we had to survive on, THANK YOU for your time reading thding this & any help in advance 🙂 Yours most desprado Jane Walker & Paul Bell

Leave a comment