View more on these topics

Pension experts back TPR DC governance proposals

Pension experts have backed a series of proposals by The Pensions Regulator designed to boost governance in trust-based defined-contribution schemes.

Earlier today, TPR published a consultation setting out a new framework for the regulation of DC schemes.

The regulator has outlined six key principles and 31 quality features which schemes should be able to demonstrate in order to ensure good outcomes for members.

The quality features cover areas such as contributions, investments, governance standards, administration, value for money, converting a pension pot into a retirement income and member communications.

In the consultation, TPR acknowledges the FSA rules which govern contract-based schemes already include provisions which match the quality features it has set out.

TPR says: “Our analysis suggests that the FSA’s regulatory regime is in many ways parallel to the regulatory framework that applies to occupational DC trust-based pension schemes.”

Aegon regulatory strategy manager Kate Smith says: “We are extremely pleased to see TPR acknowledging the many ways in which pension schemes run by FSA supervised firms already deliver on the six DC Principles and many of the features which underpin these.

“Some commentators often overlook, or simply aren’t aware of, the many positive governance arrangements and scheme design features offered by providers of GPPs and wrongly jump to the conclusion that trust-based is inherently best.”

Fidelity head of DC and workplace savings proposition Richard Parkin says: “We are delighted that TPR has recognised that the regulatory regime for contract-based pensions is comprehensive and delivers many of the principles already.

“The claim by some that trust-based plans are the only viable scheme type is flawed and demonstrates a naivety as to what makes a good DC pension scheme.”

However, the National Association of Pension Funds insists TPR’s proposals should apply to both trust and contract-based schemes.

NAPF policy director Darren Philp says: “We are disappointed that the proposed code only applies to trust-based pensions and not contract-based schemes. This means that around three million people are saving into a type of pension that is overlooked by this effort.

“All types of pension need to meet high standards, and we need a joined-up regulatory approach. The FSA and TPR need to work together much more effectively than they currently do.”


F&C offers Thames River range with life cover option

F&C is adding a life cover option to its Thames River multi-manager funds, offering protection against a capital shortfall of up to £150,000 on death. Investors up to the age of 79 are able to buy into the protected share classes on a whole of life basis, with no medical underwriting required, and will pay […]

Govt vows to protect UK financial services from EU rules

The Government is vowing to protect the competitiveness of UK financial services from EU regulation in its mid-term review. Outlining its plans for the rest of the parliament, the coalition Government says it will also aim to remove “unnecessary” EU regulations that hit small and medium-sized businesses. The mid-term review states: “We will continue to […]

Emma Simon MM blog

Emma Simon: The Brave New World does consumers few favours

So we have now entered the brave new world of the retail distribution review. Although firms have had years to prepare for this sea-change in industry practices, consumers are only just starting to get to grips with these developments. In recent months there has been a fair amount of coverage in national media and papers, […]


Sandringham to waive PI excess for founding members

SimplyBiz chairman Ken Davy’s restricted national proposition Sandringham Financial Partners is waiving professional indemnity insurance excess payments for its founder member firms. Sandringham managing director Steve Braidford today announced the move. The offer is open to founding members with no deadline currently set as to when the offer will close. The firm would not disclose […]

Is three a crowd?

The pension versus Isa debate has raged on and off for years. Les Cameron, head of technical at Prudential, asks if three’s a crowd.   I think the debate was arguably settled by pensions freedom when the biggest downside of pensions – limited access and poor death benefits – was fundamentally changed. Total access, albeit with […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment