View more on these topics

Pearl Jam

A week has passed since the proposed merger of Resolution and Friends Provident was announced and still there seems to be more questions than answers over the future of both asset management arms.

F&C has been quick out of the blocks in bullishly claiming it is heading the merger of the two asset managers, while also stating that it is likely to keep in place the boutique policy launched by Resolution director Jonathan Polin.

When the deal was announced a week ago most industry commentators were quick to state that it was a deal for the life side, but it has been the investment angle that has brought much of the media attention, with the mass concensus being that overlaps will lead to casualties.

F&C has also stated that the merger would lead to some £26m of cost synergies that will ultimately lead to some redundancies.

Both group’s have fairly strong offerings in the market, with Resolution being-noted as something of a turnaround story under the guidance of chief executive Gavin Stewart and Polin.

The reason for the extra attention on the investment side is two-fold. First of all, there is notable overlap on both ranges, particularly on the UK and property, where both have heavyweight funds. The second – and perhaps the more interesting repercussion – is whether the managers of Resolution boutique offerings at Argonaut, Cartesian, Hexam and the as-yet unnamed fourth multi-manager boutique will want any part of F&C.

Hargreaves Lansdown head of research Ben Yearsley says: “I’d be extremely surprised if those joint-ventures stayed if the businesses were merged as the ethos for them may change.”

Yearsley points to the role of Stewart and Polin as integral to the boutiques future. He says: “If they go why would the boutiques stay? I wouldn’t be surprised if Pearl or another firm stops the merger coming to fruition in any case.”

Much has already been written on Hugh Osmond’s plans to put a spoke in the works of the merger, following the acquisition of 16 per cent of Resolution’s shares and claiming that they do not represent good value, while others could be waiting in the wings to launch their own bids for the firm.

The more time that passes the more difficult it seems for an agreement to become reality, as walls continue to be built in front of the two firms. Resolution appears to have other “more fancied” suitors lurking in the shadows and it seems only a matter of time before another name enters the fray.


Accord chief accuses over-enthusiastic lenders of stoking house price inflation

Accord managing director Linda Will says lenders offering very high income multiples are making housing even less affordable and stopping the market from correcting.Will says market adjustments are typically driven by a lack of affordability but the necessary correction is not happening because lenders are too willing to satisfy broker and consumer demand for less […]

FSA to keep monitoring lenders’ exit fee stance

The FSA has updated on how mortgage lenders have responded to concerns that mortgage exit administration fees have been increased unfairly.It has found that most major lenders have opted either to charge a fee that cannot be varied during the lifetime of the mortgage or to remove the exit fee altogether. Other lenders will charge […]

Out of context

“What’s the correct etiquette for a fetish night?”Aegon’s Kevin Brown ponders the evening ahead “I’d stick to journalism, Sam. Have you ever met a happy IFA?”an anonymous IFA “I gave up with Harry Potter at the fourth book. The pensions ombudsman annual report was more entertaining”Hargreaves Lansdown’s Tom McPhail “I feel like I’m at preschool […]

Swuf scraps move to regain property fund from Laidlaw

Scottish Widows Unit Funds has abandoned its plans to regain the £400m UK balanced property trust from former property head Tom Laidlaw’s start up boutique Cordatus Capital Partners.Swuf postponed this week’s EGM to discuss the future of the trust, which would have seen shareholders vote on proposed plans to break up the current board, with […]

To be and not to be – Multi asset investing with conviction

At Pictet Asset Management we believe active management of asset allocation is the most important generator of returns. What is not to be in our portfolio is just as important as what is to be because good performance is determined as much by the assets you avoid as by those you hold. The FP Pictet Multi Asset Portfolio managers are not wedded to any particular […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment