Leader: Pay, profits and the perils of the FSCS

Natalie Holt, journalist with Money Marketing Photo by Michael Walter/Troika

Pay is a sensitive subject. While the headline amount is clearly important, research has shown what is more crucial is not salary and wealth per se, but how this compares with those around you.

Someone earning £150,000 in a world of £1m-plus salaries will feel relatively “poor”, though that will sound hollow to those struggling to get by.

Our own research on pay shows there is a good story to tell about the earning potential of the advice profession, with nearly a third of respondents on over £100,000 and average pay across restricted and independent advice firms ranging from £75,000 to just under £90,000.

These findings have been challenged, and it is fair to say while some advisers recognise these figures, others do not.

There will, of course, be regional differences in pay in line with disposable income and cost of living.

At close to 500 adviser respondents, the research is judged to be statistically robust. It may be the case that those who are paid more are more likely to complete salary surveys, but I struggle to see that holding true for all respondents.

The positive aspect of all this is that post-RDR, not only are clients beginning to understand the value of advice, but advisers themselves are too. The level of fee income being commanded by some firms goes a long way to establishing advice alongside other professions where fees are levied in proportion to the complexity of the work involved and the value added.

The elephant in the room though is profitability. Advice firms across the spectrum have seen the benefits of pay inflation for the last few years. Yet at the same time profits have dipped, which has been attributed to the never-ending saga of regulatory costs, and specifically the cost of Financial Services Compensation Scheme levies which have been pushed way beyond the “fair and reasonable” limit.

The unpredictable nature of FSCS levies is hurting advisers’ profits, and badly.

It is great to see there are advisers who are being amply and fairly rewarded for the valuable service they provide to clients. What is a shame is firms are earning more, but also paying away a significant chunk, and without seeing material benefits.

The long promised regulatory dividend shows no sign of materialising. The current system rewards the good guys with one hand, but takes with the other.

Natalie Holt is editor of Money Marketing



Living the high life: What’s behind the rise in adviser pay?

This article is the latest in our series on adviser charging and pay. To catch up on the stories so far, click here. Advisers are taking home bigger and better pay cheques thanks to greater business acumen post-RDR and a sharper focus on the bottom line, Money Marketing research suggests. The latest in our series […]


Nearly a third of advisers earn more than £100k

Nearly a third of advisers are paid more than £100,000, Money Marketing research suggests. 66 of the 474 advisers who responded to our poll on how advisers were paid said their average annual remuneration was more than £150,000 year That represented just under 14 per cent of the sample. A further 17 per cent were paid between […]

Clients are prepared to pay more for planning, advisers argue

Three top advisers have argued firms should charge more for planning as clients are becoming more willing to pay for these services. At the Personal Finance Society’s National Symposium in London last week, Thornton Chartered Financial Planners, Killik & Co and Informed Choice noted a trend that clients are accepting higher charges for advice, provided […]

Brexit Commentary from Natixis Global Asset Management

By David F Lafferty, CFA, SVP – Chief Market Strategist Thursday’s historic Leave vote in the UK will have both immediate and long-term consequences for the global economy and financial markets. The initial flight-to-quality reaction across asset classes has been exacerbated by the market’s misplaced confidence in a Remain victory leading up to the vote. Stock markets […]

Where next for the price of oil?

Having stabilised at around $65 a barrel, many investors are questioning if the price of oil will rise, and when. Richard Hulf provides his view. Richard Hulf, manager of the Artemis Global Energy Fund, sets out his thoughts about how the oil price may move through the next six months. At the start of the […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Oh Natalie …… “regulatory dividend” do you really want to poke that wasps nest ?

    Its all really is semantics, I have two clients who are builders there situations are very similar but their income are poles apart……. do people really care (other than bead counters) what the average is……

    Average doesn’t really get to take home the prom king or queen do they ?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com