View more on these topics

Paul Kennedy: Dealing with IHT charges on post-2006 trusts

Paul Kennedy

The Finance Act 2006 contained radical changes to the taxation of trusts for inheritance tax purposes. In particular, most types of non-bare trust used for discounted gift schemes created after 21 March 2006 became relevant property trusts and therefore subject, among other things, to a potential charge to IHT on the value of the relevant property held in the trust every 10 years. We have now reached the stage when these post-2006 trusts are starting to hit the first 10-year periodic charge and appropriate valuations will be required to ascertain any inheritance tax payable.

The value of the relevant property for IHT purposes is its open market value as required by s.160 IHTA 1984, but it does not include the value of the rights retained by the settlor. In essence, we must ask what a hypothetical purchaser would be prepared to pay for the trust fund at the 10-year anniversary. While we assume hypothetical sale of the trust fund in a real market there is no full-scale day-to-day market in the sale of DGT trust funds, so valuations must largely be guided by actuarial principles. There are a number of approaches that could be adopted but I shall cover the method outlined within the brief from HM Revenue and Customs.

The open market purchaser of the trust fund would be purchasing the right to receive the whole value of the underlying trust fund following the death of the settlor. In determining what to pay, they will need to take account of the expected withdrawals to be received by the settlor between their purchase date and the settlor’s death, and the expected delay between their purchase date and the eventual death of the settlor.

With a DGT, it is possible for the amount that must be paid to the settlor each year to exceed the growth generated by the fund itself. Therefore, the fund may be overly depleted over time. Conversely, the growth of the fund may exceed the sums due to the settlor so that the fund is less depleted over time. HMRC takes the view the purchaser would adopt a prudent approach and would not allow for any growth in the trust fund value, but simply would discount the current value to account for the delay until the fund will be available, being on the death of the settlor.

Therefore, the calculation requires two actuarial discounting factors to be built into the price. Starting with the value of the trust fund at the 10-year anniversary date, the purchaser will first discount the price they will pay to allow for the expected delay between the purchase and the eventual death of the settlor. They will then include a further discounting factor to allow for the settlor’s expected withdrawals between the purchase date and the date of the settlor’s death. The actuarial formulae and calculations are complex but, in essence, the longer the settlor is expected to live, the longer the purchaser will have to wait for their trust fund, the more the settlor will take out year-by-year and so the less the purchaser will pay.

The settlor’s state of health could be important in determining what the purchaser would pay. If life expectancy were significantly below expected norms they will die earlier and theoretically a purchaser might pay more. However, to prevent onerous burdens on trustees in obtaining assessments of medical evidence HMRC has provided a practical approach. That is, provided underwriting was completed on the initial set-up, the valuation at the 10-year anniversary can follow the settlor’s rated age next birthday when the DGT was effected, plus an addition of 10 years for each 10-year anniversary.

As an example, assume a settlor with rated age 75 established a discretionary DGT in 2006, putting £500,000 into trust while retaining a right to periodic payments of £25,000 per annum for life. At the 10-year anniversary the fund stands at £1m. Calculations are based on an 85-year-old. If application of the discounting factors produced a value of £534,250, this is the value of the relevant property for IHT purposes and to which the trust’s available nil-rate band is then applied.

With the calculation of the initial “discount” it is considered essential the purchaser of the settlor’s life interest take out life insurance on the settlor to protect their capital outlay. With the 10-year valuation, the purchaser of the trust fund would not need to insure the life of the settlor and would actually benefit from an early demise of the settlor. It follows that, because life insurance is not required, the methodology should apply irrespective of the age of the settlor at the 10-year anniversary and whether or not life insurance would be available on them.

Paul Kennedy is head of tax and trust planning at FundsNetwork



Two-thirds of advisers recommend property funds

Nearly two-thirds of financial advisers have recommended commercial property to their clients over the last 18 months. A Money Marketing survey of 186 advisers shows 63 per cent had recommended property since January 2015. Since the Brexit vote, property fund giants with assets of over £18bn have moved to stem the outflows sparked by fears […]

Tony Wickenden: What now for tax policy post-Brexit?

As a result of the Brexit vote, we have seen political turmoil and share price volatility as well as a significant drop for sterling. A post-Brexit “emergency Budget’ appears to have been ruled out by new Chancellor Philip Hammond. Volatility in share prices is something we have quickly got used to the idea of living […]


Hornbuckle parent to acquire Rowanmoor

Hornbuckle parent Embark is close to a takeover of rival Sipp provider Rowanmoor, Money Marketing understands. It is understood Rowanmoor has been on the market for some time while Embark recently acquired failed platform Avalon. Sipp firm consolidation has been expected ahead of the September deadline for the new capital adequacy rules which drastically increase […]

Why prevention is better than cure

Quoting the famous adage, prevention is better than cure; there are many proactive benefits that can improve wellness in the workplace, decrease stress, increase staff morale and reduce absenteeism, as well as attracting and retaining employees of a higher standard. With a recent study showing that employees in Britain are working below peak productivity, preventative benefits can ensure you address potential health issues or causes of stress at their source and ensure productivity in the workplace remains at an optimum level. With this in mind, how are you using preventative benefits to help keep your workforce happy and healthy?


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm