View more on these topics

Paul Evans: Time is up for ‘lifestyle’ default funds

Pensions-savings-retirement-piggy bank

There has been a sea-change in retirement planning in the UK. Pension investors can now choose the best product for them and select when and how much income they receive. They can also specify how their pension assets are invested well into retirement.

But with great power comes great responsibility and, quite understandably, the chance to manage one’s own pension will not be for everyone. With this in mind, what other options are available?

Default funds have long played a vital role for investors who prefer a ready-made solution rather than creating their own strategy. They have traditionally taken a lifestyling approach, focusing on growth during the accumulation period. The overall risk profile of the fund is then gradually reduced in the approach to retirement to limit the prospect of a large decrease in value close to taking benefits.

When most investors were expected to buy an annuity at retirement this approach was appropriate. Lifestyling default funds were able to deliver a stable value that mirrored the profile of the product providing the retirement income. Indeed, for those with very small pension pots, this strategy may remain sensible.

Looking forward, however, the consensus is that the majority of investors will not buy an annuity or will at least wait until later in retirement.

With this in mind, providers are now exploring solutions that will allow consumers to adapt their investment mix in the run-up to retirement depending on whether their plan is to take cash, buy an annuity or use drawdown.

Additionally, simple drawdown solutions are being developed that let investors select a balance between growth, income and capital protection, allowing that balance to be adjusted over time as their situation evolves. Nest, for example, is currently reviewing the lifestyling approach incorporated into its funds and is considering a mass-market drawdown solution.

But in this new flexible world, it has to be accepted there is only so much a default fund can achieve. Retirement planning is complex and requires commitment and understanding. Although default solutions are going to evolve, many investors will seek out professional assistance.

A new advice market

For advisers, the opportunity to guide investors before, during and into retirement is compelling. By offering to work with them a number of years before retirement, advisers can help to construct a strategy that reflects the individual’s intended retirement journey, the way they wish to take benefits and their appetite for investment risk versus income guarantees.

Once a client is ready to start taking benefits, advisers can guide on which investments to liquidate, which to use to provide a regular income and how to do all of this as tax efficiently as possible.

They can incorporate newer funds that allow investors to move from accumulation to drawdown with the minimum of friction or blend solutions to offer both security and growth. While annuities have fallen from favour, solutions that allow investors to blend guaranteed and non-guaranteed income should court plenty of interest.

Expert advice will also be required where investors are looking to pass on pension assets to their beneficiaries. Advisers can add value both in terms of suggesting investment strategies that help protect capital values and by ensuring the benefits are passed on correctly and tax efficiently. Ultimately, advisers have an opportunity to help coordinate wealth management across the generations.

Emerging solutions

Default funds will continue to have a place in this new world but it will be fascinating to see what solutions emerge to accommodate those who choose to take control of their pension planning versus those who want to outsource the challenge.

Expert advice and regular reviews will continue to be critical in achieving good outcomes for the majority of investors. A whole new market in long-term financial planning is ready to evolve. We have no doubt that the adviser community is ready to step up to serve it.

Paul Evans is pension technical manager at Cofunds

Recommended

Cook-Rodney.Just-Retirement.2013
5

Just Retirement and Partnership to merge

Just Retirement and Partnership, the two insurers whose share prices were savaged by Chancellor George Osborne’s radical annuities overhaul, are to merge. The deal, announced this morning on the London Stock Exchange, is expected to result in Just Retirement shareholders owning roughly 60 per cent of the combined business, with Partnership shareholders controlling the remaining […]

Govt creates £36m fund to develop brownfield sites for starter homes

The Government has created a £36m pot to pave the way for the creation of thousands of starter homes for first-time buyers. The fund includes £26m so the Government can identify and purchase brownfield sites and £10m for local authorities to prepare more brownfield land for the development of starter homes. The idea behind the […]

HMRC-HM-Revenue-Customs-700x450.jpg
1

Two jailed in £5m money laundering case

Two men have been sentenced to a total of nine years in prison after being found guilty of laundering almost £5m of criminal funds. Harkishan Talwar and Muhammad Khan were sentenced at the Old Bailey last week. Talwar received two sentences of eight and three years to run concurrently for laundering £3.5m of criminal funds […]

2

Platforum: The human face of robo-advice

There has been much debate about the role of robo-advisers and whether they will displace the traditional financial adviser, fill the advice gap or perhaps do both. Our view is that they will be used mostly by financial advisers rather than the mass market of investors. What is more, we envisage robo-advice helping to fill the advice […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Or not!
    I do tire of these articles with such blatantly incorrect headlines. ‘Lifestyle’ default funds are not, as this commentator and others seem eager to state, defunct; instead they just need to evolve to reflect the new options.
    To my mind, and some providers already seem to have identified this, the lifestyle default fund now needs to be offered in three versions: the traditional lifestyle default for those who will build up a medium-sized fund and who will need the security of a guaranteed income at retirement; a ‘cash-out’ default that moves the fund gradually to cash as the intended retirement date approaches for those with smaller funds that will not form part of their retirement income but will want to take it as a lump sum; and an ‘investment’ default for those looking to keep the fund invested into retirement and draw an income.
    This final option will not, I would suggest, be just an extension of the default accumulation strategy, but will probably need to be a more cautious income orientated strategy in order to minimise the risk of large drawdowns (in markets) decimating the fund.
    And I have always notified to clients that the correct default investment strategy is only half of the decision that needs to be made – equally important is the selection of the ‘correct’ retirement age to which whatever default strategy is targeted, as otherwise de-risking will occur too soon or potentially too late.

  2. Kevin I agree. These articles make me laugh when a Product Provider, who sell Income Drawdown start saying these things. It is all about advice and each case will have to be judged and advised on it’s merits to decide if someone should be drawdown, annuity or whatever.

Leave a comment