View more on these topics

Paul Beasley: FSCS reform proposals do not go far enough


The proposals in the FCA’s consultation paper on Financial Services Compensation Scheme reform are getting a cautious welcome. It does appear that the FCA have listened (a little) which is cause for some celebration. However, I see no prospect of seeing reduced bills coming to my inbox. Their proposals simply don’t go far enough.

Increased contributions from providers are most welcome but I see this being used to increase the scope of the FSCS, not to lessen our burden. There are several suggestions for extending consumer protection, one of which would have increased compensation payments between 2010 and 2014 by £168m.

My view is they should first be looking for appropriate reductions in scope, particularly the high risk areas. They state that one third of claims value are linked to “non-mainstream pooled investments”. Given the ban on promoting these to retail investors, surely the next logical step is to exclude them from the FSCS?

Experienced or professional investors should have a higher caveat emptor threshold than retail, and with appropriate warnings and notifications from both distributor and provider, the risk of non-mainstream investments should sit firmly with the investor.

This principle dovetails with the concept of a product levy. A product levy is far simpler than risk rating advisers and the quantum could vary depending upon the risk rating. Those outside the FSCS scope would have zero levy. This has the advantage of educating consumers and promoting the existence of the FSCS which will further enhance consumer confidence. Yet this is dismissed as a new tax that would require legislation. What is the current levy if not another tax?

The proposals for reform of the professional indemnity insurance market are pie in the sky. How can they not understand that there would be a much healthier PII market if the regulatory regime was fit for purpose? PII underwrite their risks properly. Rather than interfering in their processes they would do better to commission their advice.

Fiddling around with the funding classes merely creates winners and losers and does not improve sustainability. If advisers come out winning then I won’t complain but the increased scope proposed will, I fear, wipe out any benefit.

These proposals are mere sticking plaster and won’t solve the problems. The adviser population is aging, the market is going restricted, smaller firms are continuing to sell out to consolidators, we are not attracting young blood and the barriers to entry are depriving us of new, innovative entrepreneurs. The FCA needs to look at itself and understand that the FSCS problems are largely as a result of over burdensome yet ineffective regulation. We need to continue to make this point at every opportunity.

Paul Beasley is Richmond House Group managing director and author of a petition in protest against rises in the FSCS levy



Industry hits out at FCA as product levy ruled out of FSCS review

The FCA has all but ruled out a product levy to fund the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, but it is considering how to better link product risk with fees. In its consultation paper reviewing the funding of the FSCS, released today, the FCA says: “We considered this [product sales levy] carefully. We understand the desire to […]


Adviser trade body: Drop the term ‘product levy’

Advisers should stop using the term “product levy” when calling for Financial Services Compensation Scheme reform, adviser trade body Libertatem has said. In its submission to the FCA’s ongoing review of FSCS funding, the trade body fronted by former IFA Association director general Garry Heath argues that talk of a “product levy” has not given […]


PI and providers in firing line as FCA publishes long-awaited FSCS proposals

The FCA has released its long-awaited consultation on reforming the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Among a number of options, the regulator is considering introducing mandatory wording on professional indemnity insurance policies for personal investment firms. The consultation also contains further options for strengthening PI cover, including ensuring policies provide cover for any FSCS claims, restrictions […]

Global energy: positioning for a recovery in the oil price Š

Richard Hulf explains how he and John Dodd have positioned the Artemis Global Energy Fund and where they are finding opportunities. Richard explains how he and John are changing the complexion of the fund to focus on the most efficient oil producers. As he tells journalist Alexis Xydias, in this environment of lower prices, he […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. “The FCA needs to look at itself and understand that the FSCS problems are largely as a result of over burdensome yet ineffective regulation”. To which I would add incompetent and mis-prioritised regulation with no (meaningful) oversight from any external body, no accountability on the part of those who fail to discharge their statutory obligations and a wilful yet completely un-policed disregard for the obligations of the Statutory Code of Practice for Regulators.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm