View more on these topics

Shift to passives will reverse, Skerritts predicts

The huge wall of money flowing into passives is being driven by the complacency of investors who are trying to buy everything, says Andy Merricks, head of investments at Skerritts Wealth Management.

While concerns around a passive bubble have been well documented, Merricks says they are unwarranted as the bulk of money going into passive is recycled cash from active strategies.

“There is almost an exact mirror image of the funds flowing into passives to that of funds flowing out of actives,” Merricks says. “One type of fund is simply replacing the other as the vehicle of choice for people with money to invest. The growth in valuations, it can be argued, is therefore justified because the valuations reflect the state of the global economies rather than pure weight of money hitting equity markets. After all, in a successful capitalist world, one should expect the price of shares to keep hitting new highs.”

However, Merricks says that we could be seeing a bubble in complacency as investors shift from choosing their investments to deciding to invest in everything. “That is what a passive fund is,” Merricks says, “a cheap vehicle to invest in everything within the index that it is replicating.”

While Merricks maintains he is style agnostic, he says the shift to passive is reminiscent of the growth in passives in the 1990s bull market, which ended “spectacularly” in 2000.

“When markets do nothing but go up, why not invest in everything? Does it make sense to invest in failing companies? Not really, but momentum can mask the negatives…But what happens when the direction changes and valuations come down and stay down for a prolonged period as in 2000-2003? We would argue that you would be very keen to choose what you invested in rather than just sitting in a destroyer of value.”

Merricks remains bullish on the current state of global economies but warns that the bull market will end at some point, prompting a “major reversal” in the shift to passive.

“Those active managers that remain will be major beneficiaries of the recycled capital from the ‘buy everything’ brigade. Until that time arrives though, let the complacency reign.”


SJP makes changes to fund range

St James’s Place has made a series of changes to its fund range, including launching two funds. The changes take effect from 6 November and will also see Schroders multi-asset investment head Johanna Kyrklund appointed as lead manager for the managed growth fund. SJP is launching a Japan fund, which is managed by Yoshihiko Ito […]


Which financial services names have made the Rich List?

Peter Hargreaves has jumped to 42nd position on the Sunday Times Rich List, a climb of nine places from last year, after seeing his wealth grow £849m to £3.2bn. Hargreaves is no longer on the Hargreaves Lansdown board but has kept a 32.2 per cent stake in the company – the value of which has […]


Pete Matthew: Breaking away from percentage charging

I recently took a client to dinner. He had referred another client to me and I wanted to say thanks. What was meant to be a pleasant social occasion turned into a two-and-a-half hour mentoring session, as the client grilled me on the future of financial planning and how I was preparing for it. This […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Really, what else would he say? Sorry folks, the jigs up and we’re all off to open a restaurant?

    Better to buy every thing than pay over the odds for ‘some’ things (which may or may not actually work)

  2. Surely if active fund managers were worth their salt they would perform in bull markets. After all, the vast majority of time in markets is actually bull markets.

    Oh, and guess what happens to active funds in bear
    markets .

Leave a comment