View more on these topics

Outside Edge: Mark Chilton

Mortgage churning stands little or no hope of every going away. The angry debate between certain lenders and the broking community will continue. The two factions have no real common ground to reach consensus as their interests are completely polarised.

Twenty years ago, a pricing cartel existed among lenders with attractive margins being retained on a purely vanilla variable-rate product. This encouraged more capital into the lending market supported by the advent of securitisation.

The resultant overcapacity is at the root of the ongoing price war, which has lead to churning. The customer was further empowered by the emergence of new product options, with innovation continuing today. In parallel, his position became enhanced by the freedom of information on pricing that the press and latterly the internet has brought along.

Naturally, all lenders hate what they see as churning. But they only have themselves to blame following decades of non-existent customer care and overcharging. It is far too late to turn back the clock and even if the intermediary market did not exist, customers would be actively pursuing better deal themselves.

Those very consumers recognise the changing appeals of different products at different times so the dream of a lifetime low-margin variable rate will never meet a thinking customer&#39s requirements. The killer argument is that for as long as existing pricing models remain, a borrower will always be better off if wedded to variable-rate loans by taking the best discount products without overhangs and remortgaging at the end of the discount.

The advent of flexible loans might have mitigated this effect were it not for overcapacity in this sector, which increasingly is following the main market in price-led incentives.

The real churning issue lies with brokers. A broker&#39s only responsibility is to his client and is to advise on the most appropriate deal. That advice should increasingly in the current world economy be based on the client&#39s risk profile as well as pure price.

In today&#39s low-rate and inflation environment with a relatively uncertain world outlook, best advice for the majority of borrowers is longer term fixed or capped rates .Yet, consistently, the major fee-based brokers continue to advocate twoyear discounts using largely spurious arguments, as generic best advice.

They continue this in practice with their mortgage business massively predominated by two-year no overhang deals. The harsh reality is that their advice is being influenced by the opportunity to churn every two years rather than every five or seven year.

In a commission-lead environment, both the individual advisers and their firms cannot help themselves building a more profitable business this way. Yes, it may be tricky persuading a client to pay a small premium for the safety of a fixed rate but they are meant to be advisers, not bucketshops throwing off the cheapest deal. The broker&#39s dilemma is compounded by a further commercial conflict with lenders. With exclusive products, the lenders are even more exposed to the risk of churning at the end of the initial rate period.

Yet the brokers know that their customers have become rate chasers, particularly in the bigger loan market.

So, does the broker remain passive, knowing his customer may go to one his competitors, or does he actively rebroke the customer and thereby incur the wrath of the lender who has probably not made a cent of the customer in the initial rate period?

One thing is certain – the cutomer&#39s interests lie only third in their priorities.

Mark Chilton is an independent mortgage consultant


NU leads bond league as industry WP sales rocket

Norwich Union has overtaken Prudential in the with-profits stakes as total industry bond sales soared to £15.2bn in 2001, buoyed by falling stockmarkets.According to confidential ABI figures, the combined with-profits sales of NU at £3.1bn and Pru at £2.2bn eclipse IFA sales of Peps and Isa, which, according to the IMA, totalled £4.3bn for 2001.The […]

FSA consults on pension projections

The FSA has opened its consultation on changes to pension projections to take into account the introduction of the Government’s combined benefit statements.From April 2003, providers will have to provide a yearly illustration of money purchase pensions benefits based on real rates of projection in today’s prices. The FSA wants to include real projections in […]

Too many funds on supermarts

Up to 70 per cent of funds offered on fund supermarkets are never bought by private investors, according to Egg.It believes the majority of funds on many direct supermarkets are superfluous to investors&#39 requirements and are ignored in favour of the most straightforward products.Egg claims exhaustive lists of unit trust and Oeics are a waste […]

Pru pension sales plummet

Prudential is paying the price of cutting out commission on regular-premium pensions, seeing sales of individual policies plummet by 43 per cent through IFAs in the first quarter of this year.The company stopped offering initial commission on its former Scottish Amicable-branded regular-premium pensions products in August last year.Intermediary sales of individual pensions, which include group […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment