View more on these topics


Who am I to argue with the key objective the FSA has set itself for the short-term changes to polarisation proposed in CP80 to secure greater access to and choice of good value products for consumers?

The $64,000 question is, will the proposals work? Or will they – as so much legislation and regulation always seems to – have outcomes entirely unexpected by the well meaning and usually very clever people who promote them?

Let&#39s start by giving some credit where credit is due.

First, the FSA itself appears to have no great expectations. Both cost and benefit of the first-stage changes to polarisation are assessed as “small” by the FSA&#39s own cost-benefit analysis.

I cannot resist the temptation to ask, why bother, given what many of us perceive as the risk of damage to consumer understanding by fiddling around with polarisation.

Second, both London Economics and the FSA have recognised that to the extent that polarisation constrains competition it does so solely in the tied sector, not in the IFA market.

Even though we may believe in the credo, if it ain&#39t broke, don&#39t fix it, it is important to recognise that these short-term changes to polarisation have almost no impact at all on the IFA market. In fact, CP80 mentions IFAs almost not at all.

What significant market activity have we seen since CP80 was published?

A couple more direct salesforces have gone to the wall, so no change there, then. Clearly, whatever dire predictions many IFAs may make about the impact of these changes, those running DSFs see it differently.

They seem to realise that whatever threat multi-ties or some other weakening of polarisation may represent to IFAs, it sure as hell does not present them with a panacea for the challenges of making a success of running a DSF.

Are they wrong? If I were running a DSF, I am not sure I would regard allowing my salespeople to sell the Catmarked products of other providers as such a wonderful opportunity, unless, of course, I wanted to enable them to present themselves to unsuspecting prospects as independent….allegedly.

Whatever feelings of schadenfreude IFAs may have each time a DSF goes to the wall, there is no doubt that it has the effect of reducing customer access to advice.

The really significant moves have been on the bancassurance front – L&G&#39s deals with Barclays and Alliance & Leicester.

Let&#39s apply the FSA&#39s tests. First, do these L&G deals increase customer choice? Well, I would really like somebody to explain to me how Barclays ditching Barclays Life et al and similarly A&L canning their financial services arms so they can all sell L&G products increases customer choice.

So far as I can see, it does precisely the opposite.

Neither Barclays nor Alliance & Leicester intends to take advantage of the CP80 proposals to sell somebody else&#39s products alongside L&G.

Second, do they secure greater customer access to good-value products? I do not think we have enough data to answer that yet and L&G and its new friends have been deathly silent about the terms of their deals.

My spies tell me that some of the poor-value TSB life products were simply rebranded Scottish Widows following the takeover…allegedly.

One final point on CP80 – the proposals for direct offer. I have been trying to get my brain around the implications for IFAs for products sold by direct offer being entirely removed from the polarisation regime. I will do some more research and share my conclusions with you another week.

Tony Kempster is a former chief executive of DBS


Broker Talkback

Do you think the high-street banks will dominate the financial services market if polarisation is scrapped? “No.I don&#39t think the high-street banks will have the necessary knowledge of the market. Their activities are too dissipated.” Andrew Geary, Andrew J. Geary“No, I don&#39t think they will dominate the market but they will substantially increase their market […]

Gordon&#39s and tonic with a twist

If you like driving tractors, swilling whisky, having a gamble and, erm, procreating, this was the Budget for you. In what was perhaps an attempt to atone for some of these unsavoury associations, Chancellor Gordon Brown also promised that repairs to churches would attract a reduced rate of VAT. Then came his pronouncements on the […]

Keep it in the family

It seems an age since John Major, who was then the Prime Minister, made his famous comment about “cascading wealth down the generations”. For many people who have built up any savings, those words touched a chord. If you have savings and you worked hard to build them up, you can probably think of better […]

L&G cuts WP payouts by 10%

Legal & General is the latest life office to cut its with-profits reversionary bonuses and maturity payouts. Reversionary bonuses on its life and endowment policies drop to 2 per cent on the sum assured from 2.25 per cent and to 3.5 per cent on existing bonuses from 4.25 per cent in 1999. The maturity payout […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm