View more on these topics

Osborne defends tougher accountability rules for advisers

George-Osborne-19-March-700.jpg

Chancellor George Osborne has promised tough new rules which shift responsibility from the FCA to firms’ senior managers will be applied proportionality to advisers.

Last week, the Treasury announced the senior managers regime will be extended to all regulated firms at some stage during 2018.

This means individual businesses, rather than the FCA, will be responsible for for ensuring staff are fit and proper. The rules are designed to make it easier for the regulator to hold senior managers to account in the event of failings.

However, experts have warned the changes will add tens of thousands of pounds in compliance costs to each firm and could lead to staff demanding higher salaries.

Speaking to the Treasury committee earlier today, Osborne said: “How [the senior manager regime is] applied will be a matter of judgement, but a big systemic bank is going to have greater attention than a small firm of investment advisers. We would expect to see it applied proportionately.

“A test of the overall series of changes to the way we regulate financial services should be whether our regulators are exercising judgement.”

He added: “If we didn’t extend the regime we would have had an odd situation where a small building society could have this regime and a large investment firm could not, when the consequences of the failure of the investment firm may be greater than the failure of the building society.”

Osborne also confirmed he intends to extend the Bank of England and the Financial Policy Committee’s existing powers on mortgages to include the buy-to-let market.

He said: “The governor of the Bank of England and the FPC have asked for the additional powers and we are in the process of granting those.”

Quizzed on the appointment of a successor to former FCA chief executive Martin Wheatley, Osborne said the Treasury has already received “a lot of really good applications for the job”.

He said: “On the basis of the applications that we have had for the job, that justifies the decision to look further afield for a candidate.”

Recommended

Exploding-Piggy-Bank-700.jpg

Osborne warned tax relief overhaul risks ‘pensions implosion’

Government plans to overhaul tax incentives risk a “pensions implosion” that could undermining saving in the UK, the National Association of Pension Funds has warned. Policymakers are considering options to radically reform pension tax relief. One option being considered by Chancellor George Osborne would see pensions taxed in a similar way to Isas, with savers […]

12

Osborne’s next pensions gamble: Govt eyes ‘big bang’ switch to pensions as Isas

Chancellor George Osborne’s bold plans for pension tax relief reform could be coming unstuck as new hurdles appear to block pensions as Isa reforms. The Treasury’s consultation closed this week amid growing criticism of the Chancellor’s most radical proposal, moving from an exempt-exempt-taxed system to taxed-exempt-exempt. Expert warn the Government may face a battle in […]

FCA logo glass 3 620x430
1

FCA to force banks and insurers to protect whistleblowers

Banks and insurers must offer protections to all whistleblowers, under proposals outlined today by the FCA. In a joint consultation paper with the Prudential Regulation Authority, the FCA says firms should put internal whistleblowing arrangements in place and inform employees that they can whistle blow to regulators. The proposals apply to UK banks, building societies, […]

10

Nutmeg makes £5.3m loss

Nutmeg has reported a £5.3m pre-tax loss for 2014, compared to a £3.6m loss the previous year. The online discretionary investment manager reported a turnover of £635,381 for the year, up from £103,903 in 2013. The results say the company may require further cash injections to continue to develop and market its product offering, and […]

Guarantees in the retirement income market

Lorna Blyth, Royal London  Do guarantees benefit customers and, if so, when? To answer this conundrum we commissioned Millimans, a global actuarial consulting firm, to conduct an independent review of the UK retirement income market and whether guarantees really do offer customers better value for money. The brief The study was one of the most comprehensive undertaken […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Realistically senior managers of large firms were never and will never be held accountable. At a small firm we start at the source of the problem, say an adviser, and see if they were fully trained and if not we blame the director. At a large company by the time we have worked our way up it turns out there is no way the director could have known about the misconduct and so he/she isn’t responsible. Sometimes they’ll slap them on the wrist but nothing more.

    How many CEOs/COOs have been punished and fined for something incredibly serious which affects the whole UK vs how many directors of small IFA firms have been punished and fined for failings which affect their local area and some clients.

    So this is just further pressure on small firms. No change for the big boys.

  2. Not necessarily against this but should it not apply to senior management of CMCs as well?

  3. Interesting. So ‘….tough new rules which shift responsibility from the FCA to firms’ senior managers…’ So what responsibility exactly have the FCA taken previously? Have they taken responsibility for the catalogue of business failures and scandals that they were overseeing and that we are now expected to pay for? Please forgive me if they have, its just I haven’t noticed it whilst trying to complete my already excessive regulatory burdensome work for them.

    And if this is such a sea change for the regulators – you know, taking even less responsibility than they have done hitherto – I presume there will be a significant reduction in regulatory fees.

    Just in time for Christmas too. Lovely.

Leave a comment