View more on these topics

Older mortgage borrowers face more hurdles after pensions overhaul

It has been a tough time for older mortgage borrowers as lenders cut maximum age limits. But with the implementation of the Mortgage Market Review and the Budget announcement of new pension freedoms, things could get even more difficult, experts warn. 

In the past two years, lenders have pulled away from lending to people in their eighties and made the seventies the new maximum. If, for example, a lender says a mortgage must be paid off in full by age 70 so the average person will be unable to take out a fresh 25-year mortgage when they hit 45. 

Given the average unassisted first-time buyer is aged 38 and rising, this is not insignificant. Moneyfacts data shows some lenders have a maximum age limit as low as 65, including Clydesdale & Yorkshire Banks and Kensington.


The best hope for borrowing into old age lies with small building societies, typified by Bath, Family, Monmouthshire and Vernon building societies, all of which have no borrowing age limits. Given the average unassisted first-time buyer is aged 38 and rising, this is not insignificant. Moneyfacts data shows some lenders have a maximum age limit as low as 65, including Clydesdale & Yorkshire Banks and Kensington.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders says most lenders will have an exceptions policy on age limits if there is a rational reason to lend.

“We have a steady stream of letters from people who are being told by their bank or building society that they can’t get a loan,” says Age UK senior policy adviser Lucy Malenczuk. “They are getting the message that it is nothing to do with affordability, it is just their age. As people start to work longer and buy homes later, we would expect to see age limits move in an upwards trajectory. But it is going in the other direction.”

Figures from the Office for National Statistics show there are more than half a million Britons aged over 90 and that number is expected to increase.

Coreco Group director Andrew Montlake says: “Lenders are worried about the PR fallout. The prospect of repossessing someone older is difficult. If you take that out of the equation, there is no sensible reason why there should not be more lending to older people.”

But concerns over bad publicity are being combined with regulatory hurdles as the MMR and new pension freedoms throw up difficulties.

The CML says there are a number of reasons why lenders are reluctant to lend into old age, including the MMR rules that came into force in April.

CML head of member and external affairs Sue Anderson says: “Lenders now have to take a very clear view of when someone is going to retire and what their income will look like in retirement.

“How do you verify both and counter the regulatory environment down the line? It’s an area where the current rules need looking at to see if they are proportionate.”

The uncertainty over assessing affordability is being compounded by new rules on pension freedoms. From next April, anyone aged 55 or over will be able to withdraw their entire pension pot subject to marginal tax rates.

Anderson says: “Under the MMR, you need to take a view of what the [person’s] income will look like and [with these pension changes] you might not know. 

“If someone can take a big lump sum, it adds uncertainty about what is deemed an adequate assessment. It adds complexity.”

John Charcol senior technical manager Ray Boulger says the pension reforms will revolutionise at-retirement incomes so lenders will need to be much smarter when assessing affordability. 

However, he adds there are still many pensioners with fixed retirement incomes so lending policies remain “bizarre”.

“There are a lot of people in retirement with income that is not only provable but guaranteed to last for the rest of their life,” he says. 

“Most lenders will now lend 95 per cent loan-to-value mortgages to someone who might lose their job tomorrow but won’t lend to someone who has a guaranteed income for life purely because of their age.

“Older borrowers are also more likely to want lower LTVs – mostly under 50 per cent – so the risk to lenders is virtually nil. The worst-case scenario is that the borrower dies or has to go into a care home. 

“It is rather bizarre and a very obvious example of market failure.”



Bestinvest founder returns with wealth management deal

Bestinvest founder John Spiers has returned to wealth management by acquiring the financial planning arm of Truestone Asset Management. The Truestone wealth management business, which has been rebranded to EQ Investors, is responsible for £500m in client assets. The business has been acquired for an undisclosed sum. Founder of Truestone Paul Szkiler is to focus […]


FCA cracks down on misleading financial promotions

The FCA has stepped up its efforts to crack down on misleading financial promotions as new data shows the regulator intervened almost every day to ask firms to change or withdraw their adverts. Research from regulatory consultants Bovill shows the FCA asked firms to change or withdraw 328 financial promotions in the 12 months to […]

Lisa Winnard: Don’t let bad financial decisions drag young people down

The recent Money Advice Service press release, entitled, It’s time to talk: young people and money regrets, reveals one in six young adults admit their debt has spiralled out of control. This highlights how vulnerable to poor financial decisions young people can be. This is even more of a concern when we consider the economic […]


Case study: administration — implementing a management log

Our client is a leading video game and publishing company best known for its console role-playing game franchises. The client provides a number of benefits, at varying levels and cost that attract a P11d liability. With the absence of a management log to track data for benefit movements, enormous administrative and therefore cost implications were occurring each year just to comply with P11d reporting requirements.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I have many clients who are n their 70s with buy to let portfolios (some with net assets of £3M) yet the Lenders seem to have taken an ageist stance to this. They must believe people in their 70s are too poor or incapable of looking after their own finances. Its a nanny state position. every case should be on its own merits age shouldn’t come in to it if its affordable under the lenders criteria. We are all living longer.

Leave a comment