View more on these topics

OFT: CPMA should have statutory objective to promote competition

John Fingleton

The Consumer Protection and Markets Authority should have a statutory objective to promote competition, according to the Office of Fair Trading.

Giving evidence to the Treasury select committee this morning, OFT chief executive John Fingleton said the move would be consistent with the Government’s intentions for the CPMA.

He said: “The CPMA should have a top-line objective to promote competition, in other words in setting its rules, in thinking about how it regulates the industry it should think about promoting competition.

“It would be consistent with the intentions of the Government that the CPMA should be a consumer and market facing regulator.”

Fingleton has been tipped as a contender for the top job at the CPMA.

He told the hearing that despite progress from banks over transparency of charges, more needs to be done as it is a key driver for consumer inertia.

He said: “Each step has required a lot of engagement and work and progress has been incremental.”

“What concerns us is the inability of people to understand what they pay for their bank account, and the inability resulting from that for them to make any meaningful comparison between them.”  

He said the OFT had “pushed its instruments as hard as it can” and the CPMA must take consumer inertia seriously and be given sanctions to help them.

Fingleton said the merger between Lloyds and HBOS “became a juggernaut that was difficult to stop” and that it was a mistake not to refer it to the competition commission.

He said: “We would have obviously preferred if they had used the reference to the competition commission and gone down that path. I think that was a mistake.”


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. If the CPMA retains the consumer champion mantle of the FSA then it should be required to explain that independent advice is the best and that consumers should search it out rather than trail into the first bank branch that presents itself.

    Let’s not forget that it was the OFT that insisted that polarisation was not in the bets interests of consumers. Explain that one, John.

  2. What the CPMA most certainly not have is the FSA’s statutory immunity from prosecution ~ an open mandate for unaccountable tyranny if ever there was. What hope of that, we wonder?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm