View more on these topics

OECD issues warning on pension freedoms

Organisation recommends deferred-life annuities to meet demands for flexibility and guarantees

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has warned the pension freedoms granted to savers in the Budget could act as a disincentive to work and that “myopic” savers could run out of money.

In its Pensions Outlook 2014 report, published this week, the OECD says new rules on how people access their defined contribution savings increase individuals’ control but could be “detrimental to both retirement income adequacy and incentives to work”.

It says: “While this measure might increase pensioners’ control over their accumulated funds, it could be detrimental to both retirement income adequacy and incentives to work, due to individuals’ myopic behaviour and insufficient financial literacy.”

It adds the success of the reforms hinges on savers’ abilities to budget their savings to ensure they do not run out of money in retirement. The report says: “The overall outcome depends on how successful individuals are in assessing their needs over their remaining life expectancy. In any case, such withdrawals bear risk that retirees outlive their savings, especially those with low wealth.”

To give savers flexibility over their pension pots and the security of a guaranteed income, the OECD suggests using deferred life annuities.

It says while pensioners “need flexibility and liquidity” in early retirement, it “recommends to combine programmed withdrawals during the first years in retirement with a deferred life annuity that starts paying later in retirement, for example at age 80”.

It also notes the “framing” challenges faced by annuity providers, where savers misunderstand the products and see them not as longevity insurance but investments.

The OECD also says providers and defined benefit pension schemes could face “serious problems” if mortality and life expectancy continue to improve.

Despite widespread reforms following the financial crisis – including the introduction of auto-enrolment in the UK – the OECD says it will take “many years” for the changes to take effect and that “further measures” will be needed.

Principal economist and head of the private pension unit Pablo Antolin says: “The compounding pressure on Governments’ finances and increased longevity is undermining the sustainability of pension systems across the OECD countries. Although many members have begun in-depth reforms, this is still work in progress. It will take many years to embed the changes and further measure will be required to strengthen private pensions, increase coverage and contributions and reinstate public trust.”

spending

Recommended

Citizens-Advice-Bureau-CAB-500x320.jpg

Wells Street Journal: Guidance out of the hat?

Last week the Chancellor delighted homebuyers and possibly secured next year’s general election for the Tories by pulling a stamp duty rabbit out of the hat during the Autumn Statement. But WSJ surely cannot be alone in being left with a sense of disappointment when George Osborne finished speaking. For where was the big reveal […]

Currency-Money-20-pound-note-GBP-700.jpg
67

FOS: £50 complaint fee ‘unaffordable’ for consumers

The Financial Ombudsman Service has rejected the suggestion that it should charge consumers a complaint fee of £50 to £100, claiming this would prevent those suffering hardship from using its service. In its latest newsletter this week, the FOS says it hears from many businesses that it should charge consumers “a nominal fee” of £50 […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I’m afraid I found this article very poor indeed. Where is the explanation as to why exactly the OECD tells that pension freedoms are a disincentive to work?
    I certainly agree with the negative sentiments and that people are very likely to run out of money.
    However the reproduction of the graph is disingenuous in the extreme. It only shows the percentage of expenditure to GDP. To our shame we are 10th from the bottom, but when you look at the sensible matrix we are dead last. And that is the percentage pension to national average income.
    The one statistic which is never covered is what is the percentage return over a lifetime’s tax attributed to state pensions? I’ll bet it is absolutely derisory.
    Please may we have journalistic content which is much more cynical and much less prone to just regurgitating stuff with no deeper thought or analysis.

Leave a comment