View more on these topics

Octopus losses are a ‘wake-up call’ for EIS industry


The £8m losses by Octopus in one of its low-risk EIS products is a “wake-up call” for the industry and should highlight the riskiness of the product to advisers, warns Enterprise Investment Scheme Association director general Sarah Wadham.

Investors who don’t understand enterprise investment schemes shouldn’t buy them as they can lead to big losses that not all can afford, experts warn.

Wadham says: “It is not just about losing your money but more about the appropriateness of who advisers sell EIS to.”

The warning comes after VCT and EIS provider Octopus Investments is facing up to huge losses when an EIS marketed as low risk bled almost £8m over four years.

Around 170 people invested £18.3m in Octopus EIS 2. The investment vehicle has almost halved in value since 2011, with nine out of 10 firms it invested in losing money.

Wadham adds: “What happened to Octopus, the leader in the EIS space, is certainly not good for the industry.

“Obviously when we have something like this the whole industry suffers, it is a wake-up call for everyone – you can’t just pretend it isn’t a risky product.”

EISs offer generous tax breaks to encourage investment in smaller, privately-owned businesses. Since April 2011 investors in the schemes have received 30 per cent income tax relief provided the investment is held for three years.

However, Hargreaves Lansdown senior analyst Laith Khalaf, questions the branding on the Octopus product.

He says: “I find it hard to see how an EIS can be described as lower risk with a predictable return while investing in start-up companies.

“Investors and advisers are attracted to these products because of the generous tax breaks but they need to spare more than a thought for the investment proposition too. It is important not to let the tax tail wag the investment dog.”

The whole point of the EIS tax break is to promote investment in start-ups and small companies, but “advisers should know their customers, that is why there are restrictions [on investors],” says Wadham.

She adds: “The FCA has made clear these products are only sold to either sophisticated investors who know what they are doing: high-net-worth individuals or people who have an adviser who can judge whether their customers should be in these products. It is up to the advisers to make it clear that there is a risk of losing your money and that you won’t necessarily get your money out at any time that suits you.”

Informed Choice managing director Martin Bamford says investors should only consider EIS “as a last investment option”.

He says investors in this market have to be prepared for the risk of total loss.

Octopus’ EIS 2 invested in the media industry, including unquoted film and music rights companies, between February and April 2011.

The concentrated nature of the EIS may have had a hand in its downfall, says Wadham.

Schemes that focus only on one niche industry are not a good idea as they can’t spread the risk, says Wadham, although investors should be spreading their risk among more than one EIS product.

However, Octopus says it diversified EIS 2 by investing in more companies. “We highlight diversification as a key risk within the EIS product brochure. The product brochure for [this fund] stated that we would invest investors’ money in a portfolio of at least five EIS qualifying companies.”

Octopus adds that the losses should not come as a surprise to investors as the fund has “been underperforming for over a year, which has been communicated to our investors in our valuation reports and updates”.



Greece sets out new reform plan to EU and IMF

Greece has put forward a revised set of reforms to the European Union and the International Monetary Fund as its deadline to repay a total of €1.5bn looms. The BBC reports Greece has put forward proposals under which the country is willing to increase VAT and give ground on the target surplus Greece needs to […]

FCA logo glass 620x430

FCA confirms pension transfer qualifications overhaul

The FCA has published its final rules on pension transfers, which takes effect from today, including a climbdown on occupational transfers without safeguards. In March, the regulator announced a radical tightening of pension transfer rules in light of expected greater demand to access the new pension freedoms. The FCA had proposed to continue to consider […]


Osborne to lock in budget surplus

Chancellor George Osborne is pushing to commit future governments to maintaining a budget surplus in years when the economy is growing. The BBC reports the new plans will give the Office for Budget Responsibility the power to decide whether a government should be able to spend more than it takes in, for example in years of […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. jonathan gamlin 10th June 2015 at 5:21 pm

    Here we go again , complaints will be the result and FOS will be there to pay up ! But guess who foots the cost , yes all the advisers who haven’t invested in this scheme and all the advisers who don’t recommend EIS whatever the tax benefits . This is clearly high risk and should have been marketed as such . We need to act on esoteric and high risk investments before the costs to us spiral out of control !

  2. I’m not a great one for supporting the providers in our industry, but I can’t help smelling something a little cynical about this article when Octopus EIS2 is old news and EIS7 has just announced an on target maturity. I recommend these types of products to higher net worth individuals who would otherwise be subject to 40/45% income tax and a high probability of 40% Inheritance Tax on their estates. If the client is well diversified and understands what they are doing and why, these products have a place. I’m not sure how helpful some of this press coverage is.

  3. The combination of initial and loss relief will have softened the blow considerably, hopefully most of the investors are not risk averse retail clients, I only have two invested in what are higher risk investments. Risk of loss of capital is around 42p in the pound net of reliefs, you can easily lose 58% in a collective or single stock, so EIS schemes should not be considered toxic.

  4. southerner stevens 27th April 2016 at 10:37 am

    is anyone looking to complain about this investment? if so I would be interested in hearing from you.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm