View more on these topics

OBR must improve projections, says Redwood

The Office of Budget Responsibility must improve the accuracy of its projections or it risks a loss of confidence in the reliability of its figures, according to Conservative MP John Redwood.

In the Budget in March, Chancellor George Osborne announced the OBR had downgraded its growth forecast for 2011 from 2.1 per cent to 1.7 per cent and for 2012 from 2.6 per cent to 2.5 per cent.

Writing on his blog, Redwood calls on the forecaster to apply more scepticism to its forecasts.

He says: “The OBR’s early optimism over growth led to a downward revision of crucial figures for controlling the deficit within nine months of the first forecast. This has not yet mattered but it will be important in the future that they have a better track record to keep market confident in the figures and the system.”

Osborne has made it the Government’s first priority to reduce the structural deficit and Redwood says that efforts to control public finances are sensitive to changes in the level of growth because higher growth means extra revenue without the need to change tax rates.

Redwood also criticises the Bank of England for being “too optimistic” about inflation, “the very thing it is meant to be targeting and controlling”, adding it has frequently had to revise its inflation forecasts upwards.

He says: “Errors in these crucial forecasts by the very bodies that have to make decisions or publish warnings based on them is dangerous for our economy and recovery.”

He adds: “The Government is going to need a strong and convincing growth policy if it is to hit the exacting OBR targets for growth in 2013, 2014 and 2015, when they expect growth to be well above the old trend let alone the more recent one.”

The OBR predicts growth of 2.9 per cent in 2013 and 2014 and 2.8 per cent in 2015.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Julian Stevens 6th June 2011 at 9:51 am

    It’s a very great shame that there’s no OBR overseeing the way in which the FSA spends the half a billion pounds it forces the industry to pay for its existence and activities. What, if any, powers will the NAO have over the FSA? In all probability, those powers will extend to nothing more than making a few limp-wristed recommendations which, as an “independent” (for which read totally unaccountable) body the FSA will be entirely free to ignore, with the full acquiesence of the likes of Mark Hoban. Nothing will change.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com