View more on these topics

‘Nuclear deterrent’ needed for employers with DB schemes

Jamie Clark – Business Development Manager, Royal London 

Further to its investigation into the collapse of BHS and the impact on its pension scheme, the Work and Pensions Select Committee sets out its recommendation for defined benefits (DB) schemes going forward. We take a look at the main findings.

Not all employers are naughty

The report is primarily aimed at employers who try to avoid their DB liabilities using methods such as deliberate underfunding, corporate restructures and interminable deficit recovery plans.

As the report says, “Responsible employers, which are the overwhelming majority, have nothing to fear from what we propose.” It is hoped that the recommendations made in this report will be taken forward into a Green Paper, promised by Government in early 2017.

A nuclear deterrent to avoidance

In perhaps its most headline-grabbing recommendation, the report says that The Pensions Regulator (TPR) should be empowered to increase the fines it could impose on employers by up to three times the current amounts. Bigger fines, the report argues, could act as a deterrent to employers shirking their DB responsibilities. It also recommends additional measures aimed at reducing the risk of scheme collapse, including:

  • Empowering trustees and members so that they can force the employer to give them timely information that could affect the scheme
  • Allowing employers with small schemes to aggregate them into a scheme run by the Pension Protection Fund, to benefit from economies of scale
  • Employers and trustees should be able to negotiate the benefit indexation rules, perhaps reducing or postponing indexation for a limited period
  • Members should be able to benefit from certain aspects of the ‘pensions freedoms’

A nimbler regulator

Regulatory intervention is cited in the report as “often clunky” and “concentrated at stages when a scheme is in severe distress”.

To tackle this, the report recommends that The Pensions Regulator (TPR) should be able to act more quickly in high-risk schemes and that scheme valuations and recovery plans should be submitted to TPR sooner.

Finally, citing the 23 year recovery plan put in place for the BHS scheme, the report recommends that recovery plans in excess of 10 years should only be agreed in exceptional circumstances.

Scheme reconstructions and corporate transactions

Where an employer is in immediate danger, The Regulated Apportionment Arrangement (RAA) can be used by TPR to negotiate potentially better-than-PPF benefits for scheme members. However this is rarely used as it is an emergency power that can only be used in specific circumstances.

The report recommends that the circumstances under which it can be used should be widened, and the process streamlined. Perhaps surprisingly, there is no statutory requirement to inform TPR of corporate transactions that could affect the viability of defined benefit schemes.

The report recommends that there should be a legal requirement to inform TPR in high-risk cases.


DB transfers – one more factor to consider

Jim Grant – Senior Product Insight & Technical Support Analyst We look at how higher DB transfer values could cause a lifetime allowance issue and how that affects the advice process. Advisers are receiving an increasing number of requests from clients looking to transfer their pension from final salary schemes to personal pensions. This is a […]

Time to stop the salami slicing on tax relief

Steve Webb  – Director of Policy and External Communications As the Autumn Statement approaches, Steve Webb calls for the Government to stop tinkering with tax relief. Twice a year, in the run-up to the Spring Budget and the Autumn Statement, we face a torrent of speculation as to what changes the Chancellor might make to […]

The Downsizing Delusion: Why relying exclusively on your home to fund your retirement may end in tears

By Steve Webb, director of policy The British obsession with homeownership can have dangerous consequences. A recent survey by Barings¹ found that up to three million people of working age were planning to rely wholly on the value of their home to fund their retirement. We are not talking about people investing in buy-to-let or […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm