View more on these topics

Nick Bamford: We can’t ignore our demographic destiny

Nick Bamford MM 700

The topic of care fees planning was high on the agenda at a recent team meeting. Our guest speaker, Partnership’s Martyn Halls, shared with us some very interesting statistics. Apparently, there are currently some 431,000 people in residential care homes, out of a population of 3.7 million aged over 65. There are also more than 821,000 over 65-year-olds who suffer from dementia, with this number set to rise dramatically in the coming years.

As we live longer and suffer the consequences of old age (both physically and mentally) there is going to be a growing demand upon financial resources to ensure quality of care in later life.

Of those people seeking impartial, professional advice on the subject only 7,000 get it from a “qualified” adviser. That sounds to me like a huge opportunity for the IFA sector. It is pretty much a given that those seeking care for their elderly relatives have the quality of that care high on their agenda.

Another key concern is to protect as much of the relative’s estate as possible in order to ensure anticipated inheritances are not significantly or entirely eroded.

The post-war baby boomer generation is very much the sandwich generation, having to potentially balance looking after their children and elderly relatives. Care fees planning represents one of those things they need to do well. And who is better placed than an IFA to balance those two key needs and wants?

When you look at the average costs of care at home or in a residential care facility, it is easy to see how a modest estate might be significantly eroded, particularly when considering one in eight people will be in care for at least seven years of their life.

Often, when putting a financial plan together for a client, one of the “what if?” scenarios that they ask us to consider is the cost of care. The challenge, of course, is that the start and end date of care requirements are simply unknown.

The adviser will also have to deal with some of the common myths associated with this subject, such as the one involving giving everything away and making a local authority pay. Deliberate deprivation is never the panacea that some think it is.

With the recent news that the £72,000 cap on care fees is to be delayed until April 2020, it is clear that those with the financial resources to pay for care will have to pay for care. Even those in the “fortunate” position of securing local authority or NHS funding for their care needs might prefer to pay for a higher standard of privately delivered care in later life.

As financial planners, we ignore the demographic destiny of this country at our peril. Those of us who choose to focus on retirement and investment planning are quickly realising the challenges of managing decumulation of assets. Care fees take this decumulation planning to another level entirely.

Nick Bamford is executive director at Informed Choice

Recommended

Brooks Macdonald appoints deputy CEO

Brooks Macdonald has promoted Andrew Shepherd to be deputy chief executive, a newly-created role “to broaden the senior management team”. Shepherd, who joined the wealth manager in 2002, was an executive director of the group and joint managing director of Brooks Macdonald Asset Management with Nick Holmes. After Shepherd’s appointment, effective from today, Holmes will […]

Business-Corporate-Commuters-People-700x450.jpg
2

Sesame in independent label error

Sesame was still advertising itself as an independent adviser last week, despite signalling it would operate as restricted nearly two years ago. In November 2013 Money Marketing revealed the network would become restricted for investments and pensions in 2014 but remain independent for mortgages and protection. In March this year the network revealed it would […]

Survey cover

EEF/Jelf Employee Benefits Sickness Absence Survey 2015

EEF stated in its 2015 EEF Manifesto that the UK’s growth prospects depend on people being fit, working and productive. Keeping people in work and helping people return to work is very important for the manufacturing sector. It means boosting productivity by getting people back into work as early as is possible, as well as fostering workplace cultures and environments that proactively manage individuals’ health conditions so that all can benefit from lower sickness absence outcomes.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Care homes are not the only solution.

    My father in law died at age 94. He lived at home and had a full time carer. He (the carer) could drive so my father in law was chauffeured in his own car!

    My wife’s uncle lived to 100 – at home – with a carer. Her Aunt will be 103 in September and has only just gone into a carte home (3 months ago). Previously she lived at home with carers.
    Living at home with carers is a whole lot cheaper than a care home and the folks get to stay in their own home which they far prefer. Aunty is forever going on about going back home!
    Sure if you lose your marbles that may be a different matter, but for those who are of sound mind, but frail of body there is certainly a way to continue to live at home – by far the preferred option.

    It is only the providers who bleat on about homes – talking up their book – as ever. Anyway in the old days grandparents lived with their children as my own grandfather did.

  2. I think the UK population aged over 65 is nearer twice the figure quoted which then gives a different perspective entirely on the numbers involved.

Leave a comment