View more on these topics

Nic Cicutti: Should journos come under hospitality crackdown?


Should providers stop providing hospitality and other jollies to financial advisers? The question has arisen as a result of the FCA’s latest guidance on retail investment advice, inducements and conflicts of interest.

Last week, the regulator published FG14/1, in which it set out acceptable practice on the issue. According to an excellent analysis by Money Marketing reporter Samuel Dale, overseas trips, “extravagant” food or drink, overnight stays and trips to sports matches should be banned.

Sam says the FCA’s message is that “before accepting any provider entertainment, advisers must now ask themselves three questions: Is it reasonable? Does it benefit the client? Is there a better way of benefiting clients?”.

For both providers and financial advisers, the news will hardly have been unexpected. For many years, freebies formed an excessive part of the financial services scene.

Almost as striking as the ubiquity of the jollies won offer was their uniformity. I remember my one and only rugby game at Twickenham many years ago and the place was positively heaving with advisers and their hosts from life companies and fund management firms – and not a few journalists, it must be said.

What is both interesting and disappointing about the FCA’s document is how it doesn’t talk about all freebies, just the ones extended by providers to advisers.

Barely a decade ago Inter-Alliance, once one of the UK’s largest independent firms of IFA, took hundreds of its staff and their spouses on a week-long paid trip to Mauritius at a cost of up to £800,000.

The “conference” was organised for up to 200 of the group’s top-performing advisers, several managers and three board members, plus their husbands or wives.

Attendance was open to any adviser who achieved £100,000 in commission earnings the previous year. For some IFAs, the sales target was even smaller: advisers in one firm taken over by Inter-Alliance were told they would qualify if they met a pro-rata annual target of about £42,000.

The trip took place only weeks before Inter-Alliance issued a profits warning to the Stock Exchange and raised more than £12m from its shareholders, most of them life companies. Months earlier, the company had raised a further £15m after admitting it was losing up to £2m a month.

Yet Inter-Alliance’s trip was justified by its marketing director Carey Shakespeare. He told me: “Sales incentive schemes are a recognised mechanism for encouraging and rewarding exceptional performance in a sales environment.”

After I wrote about the trip he claimed advisers were lining up to join Inter-Alliance. Well, given what happened to the company subsequently, if they did it was like cows queuing up to enter an abattoir.

Hopefully, some of these excesses will have fallen away over the past decade, although I do wonder at the potential for some large networks and national IFAs to continue to “incentivise” their commission-paid restricted advisers. At the core of any such incentives is the notion that product sales and not advice are key to the relationship between advisers and their clients.

In fairness, personal finance journalists are not exempt either. Shortly after I started working at Money Marketing 22 years ago I took a call from someone working for Scottish Provident, the life insurer subsequently swallowed up by Abbey National.

My caller had an offer to make: would my partner and I like to spend an all-expenses paid weekend in Edinburgh as guests of ScotProv? The trip would be taking place at the same time as the festival in August, so tickets to some of its shows would also be available. So it was that a few months later we found ourselves on a plane to Scotland.

A year later, by then working on a national newspaper, I was asked to write a story which, while not “hostile” to Scottish Provident, highlighted one of its life funds’ extremely poor performance.

When I called for a reaction, the company was totally professional: there was no attempt by its spokespeople to “call in a favour”. The story was written as it always would have been, regardless of whether I had enjoyed ScotProv’s hospitality.

Throughout that whole experience, however, I remember finding it hard to separate my writing from the fact that I’d had a freebie out of Scottish Provident.

Luckily for me, the paper I worked at had a policy whereby journalists paid for all overnight trips. Any other hospitality could only be accepted if it was editorially justifiable or if the cost could potentially be reciprocated through our own expenses. As a rough guideline, a cinema trip or a meal were acceptable, a weekend away was not. I’ve tried to operate by similar rules since then.

I accept that many other journalists disagree. They feel able both to accept trips around the world while still writing fairly and honestly about the companies that pay for them to go there.

But my own instinct would be for a central register of any hospitality worth more than, say, £50 to be kept for both advisers and journalists. It should be accessible to all members of the public. After all, if it’s good enough for IFAs, it makes sense for the rest of us too.

Nic Cicutti can be contacted at



Financial services falls behind in job satisfaction

Only 9 per cent of financial services professionals in the UK feel “very fulfilled’” in their jobs compared to an average of  As part of its Fulfilment@Work research, recruitment firm Randstad Financial & Professional interviewed over 2,000 UK workers to gain an insight into professional fulfillment. Although 58 per cent of financial services workers surveyed […]


Standard Life testing self-direct platform for advisers

Standard Life is testing a self-serve platform which it says will see advisers retain a relationship with the client. The platform will use Standard’s wrap technology to offer an execution-only platform targeted at low-value clients who cannot afford a full advised service. Advisers would receive an introducer fee for referring business to the platform, though […]

China tech and Global Alpha: a new great leap forward

By Robin Geffen, Fund Manager and CEO

Internet giant Alibaba is exactly the type of entrepreneurial company that the high-conviction, top-performing Neptune Global Alpha Fund seeks to invest in. Established just 14 years ago in an apartment in Hangzhou, today Alibaba is larger than Amazon and eBay put together and is challenging some of the most powerful internet companies in the world…

Read more 

Important information

Investment risks

The value of an investment and any income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Forecasts and past performance are not a guide to future performance. Some information and statistical data herein has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable but in no way are warranted by us as to their accuracy or completeness. These are Neptune’s views and as such this document is deemed to be impartial research. We do not undertake to advise you of any change to our views.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 7 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. There is as real danger that firms and individuals in any area of business could fall foul of the Bribery Act 2010 if they do not record hospitality and gifts of any form (above £100 or not, I would say!).

    If journalists don’t have this procedure in place, then as you say Nic, it is advisable that they do so!

  2. As ever the regulator and now you Nick have enough time to focus on this trivia rather than bearing down on the Keydatas and the Arch Crus etc where clients can lose real money. We only have twin peaks now because FSA did not work!

    Until the regulators get their own house in order stop worrying about stuff that no one else really gives a dam about!

  3. The Hound of the Compliancevilles! 23rd January 2014 at 1:48 pm


    If the Regulator gives a damn about it then, common sense suggests, so should you perhaps?

    Isn’t it all about fairness at the end of the day, fairness to the customers?

  4. @hound
    You managed to say that without a touch of irony!

    My business is 100% focused on fair treatment of customers. But if the regulator gave a dam about fairness to consumers it would focus on the areas I suggest instead of this trivia. Even if an adviser was persuaded to use say a marginally more expensive product than optimum the consumer losses what, a couple of bps? Meanwhile some consumers lost everything courtesy of Arch Cru, Keydata and Harlequin – issues where the regulator was demonstrably ineffective. The FSA had huge resources and wasted almost all of them on this sort of relative trivia.

    Meanwhile If anyone thinks a £100 rugby ticket or whatever will make a scrap of difference to the business decisions of someone making 6 figures they are deluded…

    Lastly whether company x is spending its marketing budget on more telesales or targeted hospitality makes zero difference to consumer fairness.

    Too long running with the hounds I fear.

  5. Well said Simon !!!

    Basically as the FSA before them, the FCA seem more focused on the country lanes than the pile ups on the motorways behind them !!!
    Whilst; I may had, enjoying the “free” flowers and mini breaks they believe is value for money ?

  6. There’s normally a few IFA’s wanting to hospitalise Nic on here!

  7. Every Christmas I hand out some nice wine to some of my clients and a few professional connections. It is not a bribe and is not done with pre-conditions, it is done purely as a thank you for the support they have shown me over the past year. if in the coming year they decide to use another adviser then that is their perogative and I know that I have no “hold” over them. They are grown men and are quite able to make their own choices. I’m polite and feel it is the right thing to do to say thank you. Doing a good job with decency and integrity is what makes tham stay loyal not £20 worth of wine.

    Flip that to providers, you will often find that those who receive hospitality are not brand new potential business producers but normally well established ones who are already using that company. Therefore, these things are more often than not a thank you and not a bribe to do more business. As Simon said earlier many advisers will be earning enough to pay for their own things if they feel that needy and we are all grown up enough, surely, to still be able to make up our own minds as to using the right products for our clients and not be swayed by a day at the races. If you can’t manage that then I suggest you should find a different career.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm