View more on these topics

Network Sandringham turns independent

The Sandringham network has announced will transition from restricted to independent advice.

Speaking to Money Marketing this week, chief executive of the West Yorkshire-based firm, Tim Sargisson said increases in growth and profit during 2016 and 2017 had seen it expand the range of investment services it offers.

He says: “We have moved our proposition on from the past five years that it’s not true to describe us as a restricted business now. We are very much open market so we are moving to being independent advisers.

“Clients want advisers to deliver risk-managed, solid performance at a reasonable price and when we had a long look at our investment process and how things have evolved, we realised we are no longer restricted.”

Sandringham managing director steps down

Despite the move to whole of market advice, Sargisson says the firm will not change its approach and will be working with advisers to guide their investment offerings and product selection decisions.

He says: “Fundamentally, nothing within the business changes, we’re not going to allow our advisers to go and start picking investments and funds for our products, we will still tightly control that process to manage risk. We have our investment committee that monitors the selection of funds and we also have oversight provided by an independent investment specialist.”

February figures from the FCA show a slight dip in the percentage of restricted financial advisers within the sector, now coming in at around 15 per cent. Sargisson says the move towards independent status for many is driven by historic bias.

He says: “People get really excited about the restricted/independent advice polarisation and it goes way back to when we first had the first real regulation in the industry and in those days, you were either independent or you were tied which tended to be inferior. We still suffer from that perception post-RDR and restricted is still seen as an inferior offering for advisers and clients and that impacts on us negatively as a business.

Profile: Sandringham’s boss on why choice comes second to client outcomes

“We are trying to recruit aspirational advisers, but the hurdle has always been that we are restricted, but we feel what we offer is more independent than some other firms that are out there as independents.”

Sandringham currently provides access to 13 distinct fund styles across 61 portfolios and funds from its nine managers.

Sargisson told Money Marketing the firm was reassessing its recruitment drives and would focus on building its network to 250 advisers from the 160 it has currently.

Recommended

5

FCA plans to absorb Brexit-related costs

The FCA plans to absorb Brexit-related costs “where possible”, according to its latest board minutes. Minutes from the regulator’s 21 and 22 February board meeting say the impact of Brexit will be included in its forthcoming business plan for the year ahead, due to be released imminently. The minutes say: “It was noted that as further clarity […]

Profile: Scottish Widows boss on Lloyds’ commitment to the business

New distribution director Jackie Leiper on increasing confidence and investment from its banking group parent The failed Scottish Widows/Standard Life merger grabbed the headlines last month, as reports linked it to Lloyds’ decision to end a £109bn investment management arrangement with Standard Life Aberdeen. But news just a couple of days later that the banking group is […]

Money-Cash-Coins-GBP-Pounds-UK-700x450.jpg
94

How much are advisers charging for pension transfers?

Defined benefit pension transfer charges are being put under the microscope again as the regulator turns over more potential conflicts of interest. With the British Steel Pension Scheme the latest to dominate headlines and the FCA ready to interrogate further as it extends its review to include all firms authorised to give pension transfer advice, […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Sound logic. Pre RDR I dropped “Independant” from my job title as I was unsure whether I’d need to become restricted. By RDR with the help of Gill Cardy & IFA Centre I had concluded I could remain Independant provided I had in place the right processes. and as Rory P sai’d the Independant definition chanegd in 2013 to be more focused on range of services rather than providers used and a general willingness to be open minded and saying “probably never” ratehr than “never will”. Pleased to hear that Sandingham have concluded the same 5 years later.
    (don’t call me thought as I don’t want to join a network 🙂 )

  2. Robert Milligan 11th April 2018 at 10:39 am

    About time tooooo! to be in the same pot as other nameless groups of Tied Agents, purporting to be Restricted, to be tarnished with that same brush must have been un-palatable. Mine you they can now sweep up all the IFA’s utilising Simply Biz!!!!

Leave a comment