View more on these topics

Network edge

To quote that old cliché -size matters. But then again, does it?

Last week, we have Sesame writing off the “minnows”, saying that, in the longer term, Sesame, Tenet and Bankhall will be the only survivors in the network market and the latter name in this group saying that only it and Sesame have the scale to build a workable multi-tie proposition – again due to size, muscle or whatever you want to see it as.

Of course, I thought initially that they were commenting on whether the “new” mortgage networks would all survive – in that area I do agree that being too small, for example, 20-50 members, is likely to make them unsustainable but when I read the article again and realised that the comments related to what we would broadly term IFA networks then, of course, I would disagree.

Let us take issue number one – network size and examine that first.

I fail to understand why a smaller network is going to struggle simply due to having, say, 250 RIs and not 5,000. My opinion, as usual, is based on what a network is put on this Earth to do – provide a regulatory framework for that group of RIs who have a common affinity to each other.

This latter point is important. RIs may not all know each other personally but, from an FSA point of view, they are all singing from the same hymn sheet. They are being guided and monitored by the one firm and that keeps them the FSA happy. It also keeps the PI insurer happy as he can see exactly how the network operates.

So, problem number one – Bankhall is not a network. I have urged this industry time and time again to be consistent in its terminology. Bankhall members, as with networks, may not know each other personally either but neither are they viewed as one common “regulatory” unit by the FSA.

Sesame says that smaller fees charged by smaller networks will be outweighed by the need for the four network “planks” -service levels from providers, dealing with the regulatory burden, technological support and better commission.

Now look again at my definition of a network above. Why would service levels and technological support have anything to do with what a network does within reason? The FSA certainly do not question me on these aspects when I am visited.

A network can get involved when administration is bad but the important thing is to do so only when all other avenues have failed and, even more important, makes it clear to members that that is the rule.

A network can exist on lower income – it can&#39t if you start employing people to deal with providers when that is the job of the member.

At Whitechurch, we draw a parallel with technical helplines – do we provide one – nope, providers provide such a service and would do it a lot better than we ever could.

Technological support – network members do not need a computer that can get them into orbit to survive, more important, it should not be part of a network&#39s raison d&#39etre. You need technology but I find letting members decide what they want is better. They are using something that fits their business and the network does not spend a fortune building architecture it thinks all members will immediately get into bed with.

So, smaller networks will exist because “plank” number two from the above list is their raison d&#39etre, in their opinion and the regulator&#39s.

To some degree, the multi-tie issue is a similar argument. In fairness, Bankhall is not saying smaller networks will not have the ability to multi-tie but will not be able to do so in “their” way rather than a distribution aggregator.

Why would a multi-tie operation need to have a complicated support structure and IT platform? I think there remains unanswered questions in the multi-tie debate but, if I were a betting man, a lot of networks will simply split membership to cater for those members who are a vehement “No, never” and those who say “Sorry, did you really say I would be paid 220 per cent Lautro?” Call me cynical but if I said the latter were happy to be called distribution aggregators I would be quite correct.

I was pleased to read the FSA letter about incentives. Multi-ties is a differing distribution proposal. Exchanges of money makes me very nervous – networks ensure compliant sales by members. How can monetary exchanges be considered moral and how can any future advice be correct if the network feels obliged to slant business in one direction due to a golden hello?

Finally, commission. Bigger networks command bigger rates but the gap has been reducing over the last few years. In the 1 per cent world, providers are waking up to the fact that any common group of individuals is just that but let us agree that there is a difference. Can we also agree smaller networks have cheaper fees? So take your pick.

Ian McIvor is managing director of Whitechurch Network

Recommended

New rules bring risk-based regime closer

The FSA&#39s new risk-based capital regime for insurance companies has moved closer with the publication of rules determining how much capital they must hold. Under the rules, firms writing with-profits business must hold capital equivalent to the greater of their statutory requirements based on EU directives and a new realistic calculation of their expected liabilities. […]

FSA&#39s hotline bids to blow whistle on misleading ads

A hotline has been set up by the FSA for the public and company staff to report in strict confidence on misleading advertisements for financial products. It is asking the industry to inform on firms which break the rules by not being clear about the risks as well as the benefits of an investment and […]

GE aims to draw retirement crowd

GE Life&#39s phased drawdown is designed for people who need income but not a lump sum and who want to defer annuity purchase. The firm thinks it will have particular appeal to people who are making the transition from part-time employment to full-time retirement. It will also be of use to people who want superior […]

Aye aye, cap&#39n

Not everyone wore boaters, blazers or chiffon at Henley Regatta this season. Invesco Perpetual was helping a group of well-soaked hacks to refreshments outside a Thames-side hostelry at the swanky event last week when along sailed a launch piloted by an elderly gentleman wearing nothing but his captain&#39s hat. However, such is the Pimms-numbed haze […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com