View more on these topics

Why we need to treat older borrowers better

There is a lot of effort going into addressing the issues faced by older consumers, and it is encouraging that the industry is making such positive steps together in this area. It is also very timely considering the FCA’s current focus on the ageing population, with its analysis and recommendations due in September.

The recent Council of Mortgage Lenders and Building Societies Association reports into later life borrowing are an example of the helpful work being done. The research identified most see lenders’ high street branches as first port of call, and as long-standing customers they have expectations they will be treated as valuable customers.

It seems there are two issues with this customer experience.

Firstly, there are restrictions in getting a mortgage which are seen as unfair. Secondly, customers are left feeling rejected and not knowing where to turn next.

While in an ideal world every lender would offer products to suit all customer needs, in reality commercial decisions drive their offering based on risk appetite and profit potential. This is why a broker is crucial in knowing which lender offers products appropriate for their customer, which in the later life space will most likely be the more flexible building societies.

But it is difficult to justify why customers are being rejected in such a way. At this key juncture, where customers already do not know where to go, being told “computer says no” without any discussion or signposting diverts customers to a complicated and delayed process of getting the help they need.

Overzealous compliance may cite referrals as needing proper due diligence, but there is no reason why customers cannot be signposted to not-for-profit organisations, consumer guides, brokers (as a collective), adviser directories etc. Customers should not get lost in the system.

Regulation does not stop firms from having sensible conversations with customers – so many wider discussions can be had without straying into advice. A less cautious approach has to be taken, by firms across the sector, in order to help improve customer outcomes. We should expect regulatory changes to improve transparency and signposting. Mortgage advisers should ensure customers know where to go when a firm cannot help them, so there needs to be a focus on building better partnerships.

While the CML later life report contains useful research and analysis, it is a pity that it made high level recommendations. These could have gone further, such as the need to improve lender rejection processes and to focus on how lenders and intermediaries can have helpful discussions with customers without constituting regulated advice.

Aileen Lees is senior policy adviser at the Association of Mortgage Intermediaries



Are lenders doing enough to help older borrowers?

Moves to increase upper age limits by lenders have been welcomed by the market. Many big lenders tightened their lending criteria after the credit crunch, but as the UK’s population ages, and many choose to buy houses later than previous generations, having restrictive mortgage lending age caps is not in the best interests of older […]

IFAs hit out at FCA fee increase but back Pension Wise cuts

Advisers have hit out at the FCA’s increase in advisers’ regulatory bills, but have welcomed a move to reduce the amount they pay towards public guidance services. While yesterday the FCA did increase its own fees for the A.13 fee block, which includes advisers, by 4.7 per cent this week, it did cut what advisers […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. It seems perverse that lenders are saying “No” when the exact same applicant’s alternative is to rent at a higher cost! We need to adopt an anti ageist regime and be prepared to accept that retirees will rather maintain existing borrowing rather than tie up all their capital in a property.

  2. I had a 340k mortgage for 11 years I sold my property and wanted a 100k for next property and was told only good for 25k yet income had trebled and equity doubled. No explanation given.

    In the end got property with no mortgage so two fingers to them all. Now they want to lend hand over fist on other items too late had your chance!

Leave a comment