# Multiple Gains – the simple calculations advisers need to know

It’s widely known that chargeable event gains arising on life assurance policies, capital redemption policies and purchased life annuities are subject to income tax. Most advisers will also understand the chargeable gain calculation where a client only surrenders one investment bond in a tax year. However, what if clients need to surrender more than one investment bond within the same tax year, creating a series of gains?

Where a client surrenders more than one investment bond in a tax year the chargeable gains are not added to that client’s income in order of surrender, but are aggregated and treated as the top slice of their total income.

In this article we consider the impact of chargeable event gains arising on more than one investment bond in the same tax year.

##### Example

Alexander has surrendered two UK bonds: Bond A in August 17 and Bond B in January 2018. As he surrendered both within the same tax year (2017/18) we must consider the multiple gain rules.  Bond A produced a chargeable gain of £5,000 and Bond B produced a chargeable gain of £4,000, giving total gains of £9,000. Alexander’s income for 2017/18 is £30,000 and when the total gains are added to his income he remains a basic rate taxpayer. As UK bonds, they are deemed to have paid basic rate income tax and therefore Alexander has no further tax liability.

If the bonds had been international then Alexander would have an additional tax liability of 20% x £9,000 = £1,800 on the chargeable gains. This is because potentially there is no tax imposed on the income and gains of the underlying funds of an international bond.

That’s straightforward, but what if the total gains take Alexander into a higher rate tax bracket?  Then top-slicing relief must be considered.

##### Example

Alexander has surrendered two UK bonds: Bond A in August 17 and Bond B in January 2018. Bond A had been in force for 10 complete years and produced a chargeable gain of £24,000.  Bond B, which had been in force for 4 complete years, gave rise to a gain of £3,600. This gives total gains of £27,600.

Alexander’s income for 2017/18 is £43,000. Adding the total gains to Alexander’s income puts him into the higher rate tax band, so top-slicing relief is available.

The top-sliced gain for each investment bond needs to be calculated and then added together:

Bond A = £24,000 / 10 = £2,400

Bond B = £3,600 / 4 =      £   900

£3,300

As UK bonds, they are deemed to have paid basic rate income tax and £2,000 of the gain is covered by the basic rate tax band. Therefore £1,300 of the top-sliced gain is chargeable at the higher rate of 20%. Additional tax payable on the top-slice is therefore £1,300 x 20% = £260.

Once the additional tax has been calculated it needs to be pro-rata’d across the two bonds being surrendered. This will provide the amount of the additional tax attributable to each individual bond.

Bond A = 260 x (2,400 / 3,300) x 10 = £1890.91

Bond B = 260 x (900 / 3,300) x 4 = £283.64

This gives Alexander a tax liability of £2,174.55.

Let’s now consider the situation where Alexander has surrendered not just the two UK bonds, mentioned above, but also an international bond. When surrendering a mixture of UK and international bonds all the chargeable gains are treated as the highest part of income. This means that the chargeable gain for the international bond will not benefit from the 0% starting rate for savings or the personal savings allowance.

Bond C had been in force for 5 complete years and produced a chargeable gain of £15,000.  Alexander’s total gains for the tax year 2017/18 are now £42,600.

Firstly, we must calculate the total top-sliced gains. The top-slice gain for Bond C is £15,000 / 5 = £3,000, giving the total top-sliced gains as £6,300.

As potentially there is no tax imposed on the income and gains of the underlying funds of an international bond the whole gain is chargeable to 20%, therefore the basic rate liability is £15,000 x 20% = £3,000. The UK bonds are already deemed to have paid basic rate tax.

£2,000 of the gain is covered by the remainder of the basic rate tax band. Therefore £4,300 of the top-sliced gain is chargeable at the higher rate of 20%.  Additional tax payable on the top-slice is therefore £4,300 x 20% = £860.

Once the additional tax has been calculated it needs to be pro-rata’d across the three bonds being surrendered. This will provide the amount of the additional tax attributable to each individual bond.

Bond A = 860 x (2,400 / 6,300) x 10 = £3,276.19

Bond B = 860 x (900 / 6,300) x 4 = £491.43

Bond C = 860 x (3,000 / 6,300 x 5 = £2,047.62

Alexander has a tax liability of £8,815 against the chargeable gains. In addition to the higher rate tax liability of £5,815, he has a basic rate tax liability of £3,000 on the international bond.

So, remember where a client has surrendered more than one investment bond, in any one tax year, the chargeable gains are aggregated together. UK bonds are treated as savings income but as they carry a tax credit any chargeable gains are treated as ‘the highest part of the individual’s total income’.  But where a client has surrendered two international bonds in the same tax year, the chargeable gain could benefit from the 0% starting rate for savings and the personal savings allowance.

However, if there is a combination of UK and international bonds being surrendered, the chargeable gains are all treated as the highest part of the individual’s total income. This approach does not recognise that international bonds are taxed with other non-bond savings income while UK bonds are taxed as a top-slice on top of dividend income (despite being savings income).

Kim Jarvis, Technical Manager, Canada Life. There’s an enormous amount of information on our Technical Briefing Notes page about multiple gains and other common issues, and you can also find out more about our range of savings and investments solutions.

## Tapering of annual allowance – adjusted and threshold income

The definitions of adjusted income and threshold income used to determine whether, and to what extent, someone’s annual allowance will be reduced can be confusing.  Here we try to make sense of it all. The annual allowance will be reduced for high income individuals from 6 April 2016.  Our previous article Tapering of annual allowance […]

9

## FCA mulls contingent charging ban for DB transfers

The FCA is considering a ban on contingent charging for pension transfer advice. The regulator published a consultation paper and a policy statement on pension transfer advice this morning. The policy statement is the regulator’s official response to the consultation published in June 2017 where it made five recommendations to improve transfers. The contents of […]

2

## Sesame remains top of FOS complaints list

Sesame continues to top the complaint charts at the Financial Ombudsman Service, new figures show. The network has been a leader in the list for most of the past two years, despite closing its investment advice arm in 2015. The network faced 88 complaints between July and December 2017, compared to 100 between January and […]

30

## Blog: FOS didn’t deserve the Channel 4 treatment

I’ve just finished watching last night’s Channel 4 Dispatches special on the Financial Ombudsman Service. First things first, I rate Dispatches incredibly highly. I was fortunate enough to work on one of its investigations back in my journalist training, and I can attest to the intellectual and journalistic prowess of the people on that team. […]

## Canada Life Simply Class interview – Elliott Silk

Interview with Simply Class’ first adviser, Elliot Silk.