View more on these topics

Multi-ties will not help consumers

The new multi-tie proposals are designed in a manner that will allow the big insurance companies to control and dictate the marketplace even more so than they currently do.

For example, Legal & General must be one of the biggest providers of missold endowment policies, acting as a tied agency facility for numerous banks and building societies to sell products which – in 1984 – the Chancellor said would no longer be as financially advantageous for investors because of tax changes.

Why then does Legal & General sell more of a product that is obviously going to struggle? Look at how insurance companies up to the early 1980s deferred capital gains tax liability, offsetting investment income against annuity payments and paying effectively no tax. This must have a long-term bearing on endowment returns resulting in the changes that came about post-1984.

I accept that market movements have not helped but the product was fundamentally flawed. When such products are sold in volume, it becomes clear that the public lose out.

With regard to their mass selling techniques, I have come across the “fact-finds” that they do. Fact-finds are in many ways a naive attempt by the regulators to justify the actions of these cynical institutions.

I know of one filled in by the sales agent who then asked the client to sign it. The client was not too thorough in reading the document – basically most of them do not really understand matters. The result is a problem that I have to try and resolve.

It is all very well someone having signed but when you consider the implications of tax-free cash from pension schemes, I do not think the layman would immediately put two and two together to make four. This is an attempt by large salesforces to mislead and take advantage of the public.

Moving on to L&G&#39s latest link with Barclays to sell stakeholder pensions. This is where you really see how flawed the multi-tie proposal is. The large financial institutions must be isolated to provide a basic function and the advice factor has to be encouraged through the independent route.

As an example, I was asked to provide advice on employment change. The client has taken up the stakeholder scheme with the company so Barclays has pushed L&G. I am sure it is on a commission bias – yet it says that it cannot give advice.The existing scheme was set up on a direct basis through a company that has now been acquired by Schroders but it cannot give advice.

So where does the individual go? She has to negotiate a fee with me to advise her on the effects of policy fees and annual fund management charges.

The only people who benefit out of all of this are the large financial institutions who bulldoze individuals into a system where they can cream off profit in the long run.

There is no attempt to act in the interest of the individual and I am shocked at how Government can be serious about the current proposals. Barriers have to be introduced to isolate these people as they have one interest in mind – what suits their bottom line.

On the IFA side, there is a simple way of controlling greed – the maximum commissions agreement. I do not see why it cannot be brought back. The abuses are caused, in the main, by salesforce-type organisations and it is all funded off over-riding commission.

If those were brought down to smaller realistic margins that allow a modest profit plus advice, that has to be good for the industry and, more importantly, the consumer.

My final problem with L&G is from a final-salary scheme we are in the process of winding up. Here we are trying to work out what is best in the clients&#39 interests in setting up benefits.

L&G were told repeatedly and yet every time they go back to producing figures – which takes an eternity. The figures are on a basis it decides upon – not what we have indicated is in the clients&#39 interest.

The workload on things like this is astronomical so if one is really cynical, one now realises that the better IFAs, instead of trying to grow and develop their businesses spend the most of their time sorting out insurance company cock-ups.

Something must be done to restrict the power of these conglomerates as they have only one thing in their minds – their bottom line.

If we do not look after the end user we do not have a business. There is a natural division and the system has to reflect this. Rigid controls in terms of margins have to be introduced which allow everyone to prosper but stop the excesses that have most certainly applied in the past.

DA Budge

Budge & Company, Harrogate

Recommended

ABN injunction against star managers lifted

ABN Amro star managers George Luckraft and Nigel Thomas have had an injunction preventing them working for Framlington lifted in advance of further legal action.The injunction, which was filed by ABN for breach of contract last week, was overturned on Friday but replaced by an identical undertaking by the two managers, which means they will […]

Product Matters

It is good to see Richard Buxton return to the retail market with a new fund – Schroder UK Alpha Plus.It may look superficially similar to other focus-type launches but the make-up of this fund is very different. The funds look to capitalise on the global strategy experience of Richard and Schroder as well as […]

Geffen forms new company with £30m of Orbitex assets

Orbitex chief investment officer Robin Geffen is setting up a new company after snapping up the UK investment contract of the Zurich-based fund manager.Neptune Investment Man-agement will launch with assets of around £30m – inc-luding one pension fund and three Oeics – transferred from Orbitex and will initially target high-net-worth IFAs and the Sipp and […]

France accused of obstructing foreign insurers

The European Commission is taking France to court for the second time and seeking daily penalties of £150,000 for non-compliance with EU law on the regulation of life insurance companies.The EU believes that France&#39s actions are discriminatory and run counter to the single market by favouring France&#39s mutuals and stopping other insurance companies from accessing […]

Japan Economic Insight

James Dowey, Chief Economist, and Paul Caruana-Galizia, Economist

The conventional wisdom is that following a roughly 50 per cent rise in the stock market in 2013 in Yen terms, the Japan trade is over and done*. So the story goes, those big gains were due to a one-off boost from quantitative easing (QE) and a depreciation of the Yen — policies that one should think of as a palliative to Japan’s economic weakness, but not a cure. Rather the cure, and by implication the necessary condition for a longer-term investment case, is deep structural reforms — a painstaking re-weaving of Japan’s economic and social fabric, no less. The story continues: this is a much tougher test than launching a blast of QE, and one that prime minister Shinzo Abe, although well intentioned and well supported by the public thus far, is likely to fail. Stick a fork in Japan, it’s done…continue reading

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com