View more on these topics

Multi-manager view

2004 did not quite live up to expectations. Growth in the US was fine but the embers of recovery in Europe failed to ignite while the upturn in Japan remained one more of promise than delivery.

There were some powerful challenges for investment markets – a strong oil price and weak dollar – but the background was overwhelmingly one of consensus. Investors quickly came to terms with developments and faced them with a narrow set of expectations. This was a major factor in the collapse of volatility at market and stock level.

Exacerbating this trend was hedge fund activity. Pricing anomalies were quickly targeted and neutralised. A number of valuation techniques and indicators of stock mispricing – changes in analysts’ forecasts are a good example – were a poor guide in 2004 but, generally, the decay rate in the value of information has quickened.

In the domestic market, value styles beat growth but overall were only a fraction better than the market. Large and small cap breasted the tape almost together although they ran very different races.

Fixed interest generally lost out to equities although high-yield junk did better than both. Gilts were beaten by credit but not massively. In corporate debt, lower-grade and longer-dated stocks performed best. Overall, the gap between best and worst was surprisingly narrow.

Looking forward, the consensus is that the period of strongest growth for this cycle has passed and world economic expansion will continue more slowly. Interest rate changes will be modest. Market returns against this backcloth should be positive but hard won.

For the manager of managers, the main focus has to be on finding those combinations of managers which are able to exploit the opportunities. However, costs become very important for both the manager and client.

One of the major costs that can be managed at portfolio level is that of changing managers. Here, the manager of managers approach has a significant advantage over a fund of funds. In a fund of funds structure, leaving a fund manager means selling all the units and reinvesting all the proceeds, suffering cancellation prices on the way out, creation prices on the way in, including stamp duty in the UK, plus the usual heady cocktail of commission, spread and market impact.

A manager of managers is spared most of this. Moving a mandate controlled by the fund will generate portfolio changes but only at the margin. Even these costs can be controlled, using a specialist transition manager where the fund manager cannot deliver the sharpest terms.

Containing costs in this way will help returns and we should remember that the best way of improving risk-adjusted returns is by cutting costs. If market returns of little more than double figures are what is available, we also need to look at charges. How reasonable is it for an investor to bear total expense ratios of over 2 per cent – and some over 3 per cent – when this represents such a significant proportion of the whole return, particularly when they bear all the market risk? Frankly, the issue must have a bearing on best advice. In markets which lack volatility, how can we justify asking clients to pay such a high premium for expected alpha when most of the return comes from beta positions?


Citisolutions grounds 2,000 staff

Citisolutions has been forced to stop 2,000 members of its salesforce doing business after failing to get sufficient training and register in time for FSA regulation of general insurance.

Aviva moves to embedded value

Aviva will report its preliminary corporate results under the European embedded value principles instead of on an achieved profit basis for the first time this March.

Correspondent’s Week

I must confess to something of a mis-spent youth. At university, while others toiled their way through the holidays working at the local pub or, better, as highly paid interns at investment banks, I sat at home and whiled away the time watching TV. Months and months passed with the biggest question being: MTV or […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm