View more on these topics

MPs slam Treasury over asset protection scheme

MPs have criticised the Treasury’s “lack of effective sanctions” against Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group when the banks failed to meet lending targets for small businesses under the Asset Protection Scheme.

In a report into the scheme, published this morning, the public accounts committee says the Treasury “lacks strong determination to use influence to increase lending to small business” at the banks which are part owned by the state.

It says the banks missed lending targets by £30bn in 2010 adding that the Treasury should consider how it will “exert influence” on bank lending targets in future.

In 2010, Lloyds committed to £11bn of extra lending to small businesses but missed that target by £8bn. RBS missed its £16bn target by £22bn due to higher than expected repayments of £6bn.

PAC chair and Labour MP for Barking & Dagenham Margaret Hodge says: “We expect the Treasury to find effective mechanisms to ensure banks meet their lending commitments.”

A Treasury spokesman says: “The Treasury will study the report and respond to the committee in due course.”

The committee also slammed RBS and Lloyds for failing to assure the Treasury their assets were not linked to fraud or other criminal activity while the APS was being set up.

Hodge says: “Alarmingly both banks found it difficult to provide the Treasury with appropriate and robust data on their assets.”

A Lloyds spokeswoman says: “The request for this data coincided with the Lloyds TSB merger, making data collection difficult.”

The scheme, launched in January 2009, guaranteed to pay out 90 per cent of RBS’s losses on assets, above an initial £60bn loss to be absorbed by the bank.

Lloyds pulled away from the scheme before signing a final agreement but committed to the lending targets set out during negotiations.

The report says RBS is expected to leave the scheme in 2012.

RBS refused to comment.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Firstly, from the article: “The report says RBS is expected to leave the scheme in 2010.”

    Looks like they didn’t.

    Secondly: a big shock as banks run rough shod over the tax payer. I will bet precisely nothing will happen and they will all still keep their jobs and bonuses.

    Perhaps a few cashiers will get sacked to enable them to stump up some extra money somewhere.

    It would be funny if it wasn’t so utterly, depressingly, predictable.

  2. Hang on, I have just re read the article. RBS actually managed to miss their targets NEGATIVELY. They did worse than nothing!

    All the while, they were in the media saying that they are lending “more than ever”. When will these greedy good for nothings be called to account – with REAL consequences?

  3. My experience of clients is that they won’t borrow, as the terms the banks now want are far too stringent. The days of borrowing at 2%, 3% or even 4% (for a less than good risk) over base rate are long gone. Added to that, the set up fees can be enormous.

    What seems to have happened is that the banks have paid lip service to the Government by making funds available, but on terms which few will accept.

    What I don’t get is that, with the Government’s stake as a major shareholder, they are in a position to force the banks to do what they want, but they don’t seem to have the will or the nous to do it.

Leave a comment