MPs have questioned the independence of the FCA’s appeals committee calling for it to be investigated as part of a review of enforcement at the regulator.
The Treasury committee published documents this week following its inquiry into the appointment of Tim Parkes as chair of the FCA’s regulatory decisions committee.
The FCA says the RDC is “operationally separate” from the rest of the regulator. The committee makes decisions on some enforcement and supervisory action, as well as firm and individual authorisations.
The committee’s members are appointed by the FCA board and it has its own team of support staff and legal advisers.
Treasury committee chair Andrew Tyrie says: “Decisions made by the RDC must be taken on their merits. So the committee needs to be independent from the FCA, and demonstrably so. This is all the more important if enforcement is to become a credible last line of defence in regulatory armoury.”
Last month, the Treasury committee called for the FCA to separate its enforcement division following a damning report into the failure of HBOS. It said a third enforcement regulator should sit between the FCA and the Prudential Regulation Authority.
Tyrie this week repeated his desire for an independent review into enforcement at the regulators and said the structure of the RDC should be included.