Since being forced out of being an IFA by my ethics, I have found solace in championing the consumer cause against poor financial services advice.Now what do we get? Money-motivated companies creating exams for complaint-handling staff (MM Professional Brief, September 21). Isn’t everyone aware of the existing financial services qualifications – FPC, AFPC, Cemap, G60, etc? If they are trying to cut out the cowboys in this side of the business, they are certainly not setting a good example. To control quality, complaint-handlers should hold the same qualifications that would be required today to write the business that is the subject of complaint. Problem solved. But is it? Here comes the sledgehammer. Out of the woodwork creeps an annual bill of at least £400. For what? The insurers are winning the battle to time bar most of their evident missales and if I charged what I am worth, none of my clients would have got the service and the results achieved. If this is a genuine Government move to reduce help available to the consumer, it will probably work. This is the only business whereby if you get caught for ripping off the consumer, all you have to do is make things appear as if the theft (whoops) I mean advice had never happened. A bit like robbing a bank, where the only downside is that you have to give back the money if they catch you. Surely, if these unnecessary regulatory controls (designed by insurance companies for claims advice limitation?) are brought in and charged for, then third parties will have a legitimate claim to have their charges reimbursed if a complaint is upheld so the client can then keep 100 per cent of the proceeds. I wish that was all I had to say but I will leave you with a closing comment as I notice that Money Marketing has commented about churning, advocating trail commission instead. Trail commission is an unjustifiable rip-off. Yes, if an “adviser” provides a little annual renewal package, a small fee may be acceptable but must do nothing for the money and at the very least such commission should be capped. Just glancing at your paper this week has depressed me yet again. What a love/hate business this is. Peter Amott, Aerobenefits, Wokingham, Berkshire
McCarthy surprised many in the industry by seeming to morph into industry analyst Ned Cazalet while making a speech to pension industry leaders at Gleneagles. He called for urgent changes to the financial services distribution model, which he says is failing consumers, providers and advisers.
Well done, Michael Portillo, for his self-deprecating manner. The former Conservative MP recently told a forum of IFAs how the moment of his demise – when he lost his Parliamentary seat, followed his home and his career in politics – was voted the third best moment of the 20th Century by Observer readers and Channel […]
Threesixty is offering a treating customers fairly tool to help advisers record customer complaint and persistency rates.
I disagree completely with Tenet Group’s Simon Hudson’s article (MM September 21). First, Mr Hudson’s ideas are based on the fact that no advisers are biased by commission. If this truly were the case, then life offices would not raise or reduce pension commission payments depending on whether they wanted to increase or decrease market […]
By Kim Jarvis, Canada Life In this article we look at which forms personal representatives (PRs) need to complete and who actually pays the tax. To recap, under current rules, any part of the estate that falls within the available nil-rate band (NRB), currently £325,000, is taxed at zero. Anything in excess of the NRB is […]
- Top trends
News and expert analysis straight to your inboxSign up
Latest from Money Marketing
The Government should consider allowing people to lower their contribution rates to 8 per cent under auto-enrolment to prevent a potential spike in opt-out rates over the next few years, AJ Bell says. Contribution rates are due to rise to 5 per cent in April this year and 8 per cent in April 2019 with […]
French asset manager Carmignac has called for more clarification on the new research costs rules under Mifid II as it claims rival firms have wrongly stated what the directive means for their business. Speaking to Money Marketing after an event in Paris, Carmignac managing director Didier Saint-Georges referred to asset managers as “cheeky” in their […]
Five overlooked government credits and allowances advisers should look out for