View more on these topics

MM leader: Trail blazer Ivan Massow on wrong track

Ever the shrewd media operator, Ivan Massow managed to garner an impressive amount of national newspaper coverage for his new venture.

“As a former IFA, it pains me a little to turn the tables on my own industry but the trail commission scam must stop,” declared Massow in the Telegraph.

Massow thinks he has spotted a great business opportunity for himself in creating a company to unlock the trail commission paid to advisers who offer no ongoing service to their clients.

His firm will cream off 20 per cent of any trail commission recouped for the investor per year in return for facilitating the rest of the trail being returned to the client. The firm will not operate as a regulated adviser and will refer clients needing advice to an IFA.

Regulators past and present have allowed a mist to develop around the role and purpose of trail commission, with some advisers agreeing with clients that trail is purely an alternative to a higher up-front commission while others have agreed that it comes with specific responsibilities to provide an ongoing service.

Questions may well be asked about what service Massow’s company provides to justify taking the 20 per cent of trail per year, beyond the initial paperwork, especially given the regulator’s increased focus on ongoing service after 2012.

The numbers plastered all over Massow’s website appear to be exaggerations of the norm designed to shock consumers and create scandalous headlines.

For instance, it quotes advisers taking 1.5 per cent trail and provides a case study where an adviser is taking over £5,000 a year from a pension fund without providing a service. Its suggestion that a typical client could save £60,000 looks very high if you consider average pension pot sizes.

But most advisers should have nothing to fear from Massow and other “entrepreneurs” who will no doubt look to make a fast buck off the back of the dramatic regulatory changes being introduced as part of the RDR.

A few clients will always be enticed by offers of getting something for nothing or a free service and may use this opportunity to ditch their IFA. But those who cannot be convinced of the value and benefits of advice are hardly likely to be key clients and may well be losing more than the adviser in severing the relationship.

Are you worried about Massow’s new business venture? vote here

Recommended

2

Peer presses for rethink on FSCS review

The Government should force the FSA to resume its Financial Services Compensation Scheme review if the European Union fails to finalise the investor compensation scheme directive by December, says LibDem peer Lord Teverson. In June, the FSA said it will not push forward with its review of the FSCS until the EU directive is complete. […]

90 per cent loan from Mansfield

Mansfield Building Society has launched three new deals for loans up to 90 per cent of valuation for borrowers who do not have a substantial deposit or equity in their existing house.

1

FSA set to increase pension transfer exam standards

The FSA is set to ramp-up its pension transfer examination standards to include continuing professional development units covering changes to the tax regime and automatic enrolment. The regulator’s CP11/18 quarterly consultation, published yesterday, proposes updating CPD requirements for advisers who undertake pension transfer activity. The FSA says any changes will focus on the reduction in […]

US loan growth is not painting a pretty picture for the US economy

Written by Mike Riddell One of the current big debates in global financial markets is whether investors should believe ‘hard’ rather than ‘soft’ data, where the usually reliable business and consumer surveys have been suggesting strengthening in global growth momentum for some time now, while the economic data that feeds through into the Gross Domestic […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 6 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. What happens if he builds it up and flogs it off, or it goes bump?

  2. You have already got the FSA / FOS etc on our backs & not satisfied with that – we now have in effect cannabalism where IFA in effect is fighting IFA over a never ending shrinking pool of Business.

    I bet the FSA ET AL can’t believe how stupid we are as a proffession in that potentially we are doing there job of disbanding IFA practices for the Banks for them!They must love failed entities like Massow highlighting & stirring the debate on their behalf!

    HOW STUPID CAN YOU GET!

  3. Massow is neither an IFA nor a member of our profession. The remainder of my opinion is not printable.

  4. “Ever the shrewd media operator” – well certainly a supreme self publicist, as well as a serial business failure.

    But hang on – “The firm will not operate as a regulated adviser and will refer clients needing advice to an IFA.” – which surely means that no Investment Manager, Platform or Life Office will or can, agree to transfer trail or renewal commission to them anyway? Not to mention the whole thing being in direct contravention of FSA requirements around trail?

    Or is this just some inconvenient facts getting in Ivan’s way again?

    Wonder why he never got selected to stand as an MP?

  5. Call me cynical but as Massow’s Limited has a individual listed on the FSA Register as CF30, is where clients requiring advice will be directed!

    “The firm will not operate as a regulated adviser and will refer clients needing advice to an IFA”

    Hmmmmm

  6. Let’s just forget about this insignificant self centered greedy person…he’ll fail, again.

Leave a comment