View more on these topics

MM leader: Towry Law’s trail and error

Towry Law chief executive Andrew Fisher’s comments on the evils of trail commission have certainly caused a stir.

Speaking to Money Marketing earlier this week, Fisher said it is wrong for advisers to receive trail commission as part of an ongoing servicing agreement between the adviser and client.

Never shy of an opinion, Fisher believes trail commission is simply up-front commission paid over time and should not be linked to ongoing service levels. He says trail commission is designed to incentivise advisers to keep the client in a product, regardless of whether this is in their best interests.

His comments follow on from his previous admission that his firm receives around £6m a year in trail commission from orphan clients the firm no longer services.

Taking this admission first, what has stuck in the throats of many advisers is the fact that Fisher has spent so much of his time denouncing commission-based IFAs in both the trade and consumer press.

IFA-bashing seems to have become a deliberate PR strategy of Towry as it attempts to increase its exposure in the consumer media.

Fisher might see himself as a White Knight in his crusade for fee-only advice but some of his attacks on hard working advisers who strive to provide a top-quality service to their clients have done great damage to the sector and the way consumers perceive IFAs.

Regarding his latest views on trail commission, we disagree with Fisher that advisers taking trail commission as part of an ongoing service agreement between themselves and the client are not treating their customers fairly.

The trail commission paid to advisers allows them to service clients properly by funding regular meetings and reviews to ensure their changing needs are being met.

To suggest the payment of trail commission incentivises advisers to keep their clients in certain products seems to ignore the fact that the adviser will still be paid trail commission by the new provider if the funds are switched – with many advisers rebating any up-front commission received as part of this transaction.

Money Marketing wishes Towry Law all the best in its quest to become one of the UK’s top wealth managers. But might we suggest this would be better achieved by concentrating on its own strengths rather than attacking the majority of advisers who work tirelessly in their clients’ best interests no matter how they are remunerated.


Can you cut it with gaps in knowledge?

Let’s make it clear. I am not knocking the old guard who have tended to their community and clients over the years. Lack of knowledge is a dangerous thing, yet how do we ensure that clients get the advice they so richly deserve if we do not test for it. The FSA wants to bring […]

Bullivant says big life firms hindering Omo

Annuity Direct chief executive Bob Bullivant has hit out at the Association of British Insurers and its members for claiming IFAs will not deal with smaller pension pots, suggesting it is a ploy to hold on to the business. Ex-Chartered Insurance Institute deputy director general Bullivant says big life companies are hindering the progress of […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. If Mr Fisher of TL had not been attacking the rest of the IFA sector with what now appears to be practices which are NOT as good as those he attacks, it might not have resulted in the very people he has attacked questioning the VAT issue of TLs £6million commission received which is NOT intermediating anything and hence highly likely to be VATable.
    I look forward to hearing what conclusion HMRC come to and what statement PWC make in TLs accounts this year about the VAT issue.

  2. As with every other comment posted, I too find Andrew Fisher’s comments hypocritical. As a voice of the IFA sector, it would be interesting to hear Chris Cummings’ thoughts on Fisher’s comments.

  3. Mr Fisher must have been one of those bullies in the playground when at school. The type that made a big noise and contributed little. The rest of the class suffers and wish he would leave and go elsewhere. I hear fee based advice is popular in Australia. Go on do us all a favour.

  4. 20th November 2009 at 3:25 pm

    If someone at MM wishes to remove my post because someone has objected, please have the decency to let me know you have done so and explain why.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm