View more on these topics

MM Leader: Regulator needs to reflect on MPs’ RDR report

With hindsight, you would expect the FSA regrets its decision to so swiftly reject the Treasury select committee’s call for the RDR to be delayed by 12 months.

The move has angered members of the committee who have accused the FSA of arrogance and treating the committee with contempt.

TSC chairman Andrew Tyrie last week wrote to FSA chief executive Hector Sants to express his dissatisfaction with the regulator’s behaviour.

Sants responded to assure him the regulator was taking the TSC report seriously.

Whatever the FSA’s motives in sending out an embargoed rejection of the TSC report’s key recommendation to be published alongside the report, it has turned into a huge PR blunder. MPs feel they have suffered from the same kind of behaviour that many IFAs complained about in their evidence to the select committee.

Tyrie has vowed to keep up the pressure over the RDR and Sants may find he is called to explain himself at another TSC evidence session.

In Sants’ response to Tyrie, he said the FSA would soon be publishing guidelines for eligibility for waivers from the RDR as well as considering whether “further mitigating action” is needed to help IFAs meet the RDR deadline.

Whether this is the start of a loosening of the FSA’s dogmatic stance on the RDR or simply Sants paying lip service to the committee we do not yet know.

What is clear is the TSC has strong reservations over the FSA’s evidence for why the RDR should not be delayed and big worries about the potential damage to both the IFA industry and consumers in bulldozing through the RDR to fit in with the regulator’s arbitrary timetable.

It is also clear that Tyrie and his committee of MPs is unlikely to let this matter drop.

Let us hope that Sants is true to his word and that over the next few weeks the FSA does indeed take some time to carefully reflect on the MPs’ recommendations and consider whether a short delay combined with some added flexibility for experienced advisers really does conflict with the admirable aims of driving up professional standards and making charges far more transparent.

Introducing a dose of pragmatism to the RDR’s transitional arrangements, will give the reforms a much greater chance of being a long-term success for consumers and advisers alike.

Recommended

The structured products challenge: Ian Lowes vs IMA

The Investment Management Association has accepted a challenge from IFA Ian Lowes to compare a portfolio of five structured products to a tracker of the IMA’s choosing. The move comes after the IMA released a report in April which compared index trackers with National Savings & Investments guaranteed equity bonds. The IMA found tracker funds […]

Yorkshire set to shell out for Egg mortgage book

Yorkshire Building Society is set to acquire Egg Banking’s mortgage and savings business, which comprises a £2.5bn savings book and a £430m mortgage book. The transaction is subject to approval by the High Court, which will also take the FSA’s opinion into account. The acquisition is due to complete in the fourth quarter and Yorkshire […]

“Big Four” auditors expect investigation

The “Big Four” accountancy firms are expecting to be investigated by the Competition Commission, according to The Daily Telegraph. The Office of Fair Trading is expected to announce today that PricewaterhouseCoopers, KPMG, Ernst & Young and Deloitte will referred to the Competition Commission, according to the paper. The House of Commons has previously raised concerns […]

Entrepreneur launches bid for Lloyds branches

Entrepreneur Hugo Osmond’s Sun Capital has launched a bid to buy 630 Lloyds Banking Group branches. The Financial Times reports Osmond is one of three bidders for the branches Lloyds is being forced to sell in compliance with state aid rules. Osmond’s bid for the Lloyds branches is in competition with Lord Levene’s new venture […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. It’s very noticeable just how often the words hindsight, regrets and FSA appear together in the same sentence.

  2. Julian Stevens 28th July 2011 at 2:23 pm

    Tyrie vs. Tyranny.

  3. Why would amyone expect the unaccountable to become accountable? The FSA does what it does because it can. It is the very same elected MPs that have given away their powers to an unelected quasi jusdicial member of the executive – which is at best unconstitutional and at worst dangerous. The surprise is that MPs are surprised at the dismmisive way the FSA has dealt with elected memebers of parliament via the TSC and it is a wake up call that is time to reassert the dominance of parliament over the body executive.

    The FSA is not accountable to Treasury Ministers or to Parliament, as confirmed by Hector Sants at a Treasury Select Committee meeting on 9 March 2011. Sants told TSC Chair, Andrew Tyrie, that Parliament needed to legislate to remove the FSA’s non-accountable status. This was further confirmed by Mark Garnier MP who, when commenting on the FSA’s negative reaction to a Treasury Select Committee (TSC) report on the RDR, stated that if the FSA chose to ignore the TSC there was nothing they could do about it.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com