View more on these topics

MM leader: Product regulation could bring benefits all round

Regulation

You can understand why the FSA, battered and bruised by events of the last few years, is now looking to introduce a greater degree of productregulation into the market.

FSA chief executive Hector Sants’ speech last week in Oxford was an open admission of the organisation’s failure to properly regulate the retail market.

The FSA now intends to intervene at an earlier stage of product development in an attempt to prevent market failures and offer better consumer protection.

Sants believes the FSA’s focus has been too late in the product lifecycle and says that in future the regulator will look to intervene earlier in
the product chain.

A greater emphasis on product regulation by the regulator raises a number of important concerns but it is about time the FSA took a greater responsibility for its failings in this area.

For too long, advisers have taken on too much of the burden for products which should never have seen the light of day.

If product regulation leads to fewer dodgy products being sold and a reduction in the Financial Services Compensation Scheme bill, then the potential damage to product innovation and other costs may well be a price worth paying.

The problem, of course, is ensuring the right products are stopped from coming to market. Sants acknowledged that this change of approach is going to require better skilled staff, which will have to be paid for by the industry. Would these staff have stopped split caps, Arch cru, Keydata or any of the other industry debacles?

Which useful financial products may not have made it through the regulator’s cordon?

One potential benefit is the transfer of some risk from adviser to the regulator that would accompany the move to product regulation. But how
far would this happen, given that the regulator is funded by the industry and so any failures in its regulation of products would be paid for by the
industry anyway?

As always, there is the natural concern that an increase in regulation and costs will not deliver its intended results.

Product regulation has the potential to introduce real benefits for both the industry and consumers but we must be as sure as possible that these benefits can be achieved before we introduce layers of new regulation.

Recommended

3

FSA bans former Merrill Lynch trader

The FSA has banned Alexis Stenfors, a former proprietary trader at Merrill Lynch International Bank, from performing any function in relation to any regulated activity on the grounds that he is not a fit and proper person.

Sir Brian Pitman – ‘A City giant’

Death of Sir Brian Pitman

Former Lloyds TSB boss and chairman of Virgin Money Sir Brian Pitman has died at the age of 78. He spent 49 years at Lloyds, rising to the role of chief executive, and was behind the merger of Lloyds Bank and TSB. Sir Brian retired in 2001 but took on a number of positions, most […]

What's going on in the 'offshore' world?

Graeme Robb, Senior Technical Manager at Prudential, explores the current state of the nation for offshore issues and highlights areas which may be particularly relevant to advisers. In the context of insurance companies, ‘offshore’ can be a relatively straightforward matter. Like their onshore equivalent, offshore bonds are ‘non-qualifying’ for tax purposes, meaning that all gains […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Incompetent Regulators Awards Team 18th March 2010 at 1:17 pm

    Just imagine to 3000 or so useless FSA staff getting involved in regulating products before they leave the factory gates. The FSA will have to expand to about 1 million staff. Well that’s a thought!

    What we need is the distributors involved e.g. sale end and adviser who know what is good and what is bad with the help of top senior execs from providers to get their heads together. Not quango nobodies who know nothing. Being efficient we would only need about 100 staff for the whole of this project.

  2. Product regulation for everyday product has to be the way forward, with cost controlled, modest commission allowed and the cost of regulation costed within the product.

    Bring it on but agree needs to be discussed with those who sell products to get the right balance and advice costs etc.

Leave a comment