View more on these topics

MM leader: No excuse for delay on pension charging transparency

The Government’s statement of intent over the need to improve the transparency of pension charges is a welcome intervention.

Whether driven by pressure from Labour or Lord Lawson, who was pushing a potentially embarrassing amendment to the Pensions Bill, or building on the Office of Fair Trading’s call for a better disclosure regime, the direction of travel is the right one.

Demanding full disclosure by adding some wording to the Pensions Bill is the easy bit. Co-ordinating, leading and working with the host of European and UK regulators and trade bodies to create a simple regime of genuine benefit to the end-saver is the hard job. But policymakers cannot shy away.

Some important cogs are already in motion. The OFT’s workplace pensions report, published in September, highlighted the lack of transparency and comparability of pension charges. It warned that simply seeking to bundle transaction costs into the AMC to create a single investment cost could create its own transparency issues but called for better visibility of such costs and more consistent reporting methodology.  

The Investment Management Association has put in place enhanced disclosure guidance for reporting transaction costs, as a three-year rolling average. The IMA’s Statement of Recommended Practice, awaiting approval from the FRC before the FCA can consult on amending its handbook, offers a fairly simple indication of all the costs experienced by a fund in a calendar year, with a breakdown of transaction costs.

Other bits of the chain need cleaning up too. The regulator rightly wants to crack down on the murky world of bundled dealing commissions while the IMA has suggested banning the use of commission to pay for investment research.   

An overload of new information is likely to confuse rather than benefit savers so a difficult balancing act must be achieved on investor disclosure. Improved transparency around metrics such as portfolio turnover and market spread costs should inform the decisions of professional fund buyers and trustees and so also benefit savers.

Upcoming European Prips regulations and Mifid II will also have an impact on charging disclosure. Some of these European rules will take years to be implemented but this is no excuse for delay. Here is a chance for UK policymakers and financial services firms to lead the way.


Trust-deed-trustees-estate planning

Tony Mudd: Are trusts still relevant?

Are trusts still relevant? Many would have us believe not. True they took a big knock in 2006 with the introduction of a Finance Act that substantially changed the taxation position of trusts. In one ‘act’ the popular and tax-advantaged accumulation and maintenance trust was no longer available, the concept of relevant property trusts was […]


SJP set to acquire expat advice business in Far East

St James’s Place is in advanced talks to acquire an international advice business in Asia. According to its year-end results for 2013, published today, the firm it is trying to acquire has an existing team of advisers in Singapore, Hong Kong and Shanghai and specialises in offering advice to expatriates in the Far East. Profits […]


Just Retirement reports 7% fall in underlying profit as annuity sales dip

Just Retirement’s underlying profit fell by 7 per cent year-on-year in the second half of 2013, the provider’s latest results reveal. In the six months to 31 December 2013, Just Retirement reported an underlying operating profit of £47.3m, down 7 per cent on the £50.9m it reported in the second half of 2012. The provider […]


Govt under fire over pot follows member reforms

The Government has come under fire for moving too quickly on its pot follows member reforms as industry bodies argue the current proposals could leave employees worse off. Under the reforms, pension pots of £10,000 or less would move with a worker when they change jobs, in order to stop dormant pensions being left with […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. There’s nothing wrong with charging for service and advice. We should not apologise for it. Policyholders expect to be paid for the work they do. Why should we and product providers be any different?

    It’s up to us to display transparency of charges AND to show what policyholders are getting for it.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm