View more on these topics

MM leader: MAS advert misleads and confuses public

“Our advice is independent and unbiased. Oh, and it’s free. How is that for a breath of fresh air?”

So says an infuriating new national TV advert for the Government’s Money Advice Service.

The service, paid for by an annual levy on the financial services industry, which this year cost £43.7m, aims to offer unregulated information to consumers as a starting point to better understand their financial position.

The Government made a big mistake in branding the service as “advice”. If you are offering advice, you must be prepared to take responsibility for the advice on offer yet, as a lengthy disclaimer on the MAS website makes clear, it takes no such responsibility.

This misuse of the word advice has created confusion at a time when the FSA says it is striving for clarity of advice definitions through the retail distribution review.

The new advertising campaign goes further in muddying the waters for consumers.

The words independent and unbiased have become synonymous with a distinct type of advice that IFAs are proud to offer their clients. The word “independent” can only be used by advisers who abide by specific regulatory rules which will become stricter after 2012. The organisation formerly known as IFA Promotion has for some time marketed itself to consumers under the Unbiased brand.

To suggest this advice is free is technically incorrect, the £43.7m levy is inevitably passed on to all consumers of financial products, and promotes a message which contradicts the FSA’s RDR aim of ensuring consumers are aware that advice should be valued and paid for.

The phrase “breath of fresh air” can easily be read as a dig at other forms of paid-for advice.

The MAS’s marketing campaign has also done it no favours with some IFAs who have been led to believe it will compete with the services they offer. A quick examination of the MAS website suggests the service is not looking to step on the toes of IFAs.

Creating more financially literate consumers is a worthy goal worth paying for, although some of the levy should be funded by the taxpayer due to the potential positive social effects of the service.

However, rather than educating, the current MAS advertising campaign clumsily guides consumers away from the truth that good advice is a valuable commodity worth paying for.



Lipsey calling for greater equity-release innovation

Lord David Lipsey has written to a range of financial institutions, high-street banks, potential product providers and industry stakeholders calling for increased engagement with the equity-release market. In a letter published in this week’s Money Marketing, the Labour peer says a combination of lower savings ratios, rising longevity and a greater emphasis on individuals’ contributions […]

Opinion split on axing products

The regulator is committed to banning products or certain product features where it bel-ieves it is likely they will cause significant consumer detriment. The power to ban products was one of the more controversial proposals contained within the FSA’s product intervention discussion paper. Respondents to the paper were divided on the idea of banning products, […]


Another FSA director quits role

FSA director of authorisations Graeme Ashley-Fenn has resigned from his role at the regulator for personal reasons. An FSA spokeswoman says Ashley-Fenn left last week to be with a family member who is suffering an illness. Head of authorisations Sharon Campbell has assumed the director of authorisations role on an interim basis until a permanent […]

Osborne to back retail bank ring-fencing

George Osborne is set to back Sir John Vickers’ proposals to ring-fence banks’ retail operations by building up a 10 per cent capital buffer. The Chancellor will accept the Independent Commission on Banking’s recommendation, made in its interim report in April, that large banks’ retail arms should hold capital equal to 10 per cent of […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Julian Stevens 17th June 2011 at 9:01 am

    My main beef about the MAS is being forced to pay towards the cost of it without, to the best of my knowledge, the industry in general and the IFA sector in particular, having been consulted about its creation, style of presentation, objectives and modus operandi.

    If all it really offers is guidance, then surely this could be achieved vastly more simply and cost-effectively by way of decision trees. Simple? Cost-effective? Not, it seems, words in the FSA’s vocabulary. But then it’s all being done with other peoples’ money, the supply of which is blithely deemed to be inexhaustible, so what the hell?

  2. if i am funding the MAS, albeit indirectly, then i should have a say in how it is promoted. if it is advertised as “independent” then you cannot give that advice without qualifications and industry experience, who are listening to the calls and providing the ongoing T & C?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm