View more on these topics

MM Leader: Listening approach is a welcome change

In last week’s Budget statement, Chancellor George Osborne was adamant there would be no slowdown to the deficit reduction plans.

With the Office of Budget Responsibility downgrading growth forecasts and protestors taking to the streets of London as the scale of the cuts becomes clearer, economists and politicians are split on whether Osborne is taking a prudent approach or a massive, unnecessary gamble.

However, whatever your view on the speed of deficit reduction, one pleasing aspect of last Wednesday’s Budget was the lack of hidden surprises in the small print.

Maybe it is too early to judge, after one emergency Budget and one full Budget, but so far Osborne is holding firm in his pledge to listen and consult on the big issues affecting financial services.

The Budgets and pre-Budget reports of Gordon Brown became famed for the blundering changes and U-turns to policy which had considerable knock-on effects for the adviser community and their clients.

For example, his move to scrap tax relief on dividends paid into pension funds in his first Budget, the proposal to scrap potentially exempt transfers into trusts in 2006 and the scrapping of pension term assurance, also in 2006, were all evidence of a Chancellor who preferred keeping his cards close to his chest rather than consult first on the wisdom of his proposals.

On pensions, the industry was led up the garden path with the Treasury stressing that residential property would be allowed into a Sipp right up until the day Brown axed the proposal.

The Government’s approach to its new annuitisation rules, which come into force next month, shows the benefits of listening to the industry in terms of developing well thought through policy.

Meddling with tax policy can be fraught with unintended consequences and Osborne’s decision to create the Office of Tax Simplification, whose first job was to investigate the current tax relief system, will hopefully add greater transparency to the policy-making process. Osborne’s decision to consult on merging income tax with National Insurance was first proposed by the OTS which has also called for a review of capital gains tax and inheritance tax.

The previous Government’s refusal to consult and engage properly with the industry led to poor legislation and flawed policies. Let us hope Osborne continues to listen.

Recommended

L&C cuts equity risk in volatility fear

Discretionary fund manager London & Capital has reduced exposure to equities and commodities in its managed port-folios because it expects volatility to rise. Executive director (investment strategies) Neil Michael says he has turned down the risk dial on the portfolios as part of a tactical asset allocation change. L&C wants to be seen by advisers […]

Schroders to merge Pacific fund into Asian alpha plus

Schroders is seeking investors’ approval to merge its Pacific fund into its Asian alpha Plus fund, following a review of its product range. Merging the two funds would also strengthen Schroders’s Alpha plus range, which features one of its largest and highest performing products, the UK alpha plus equity fund.

 According to the group the […]

Thumbnail

Case study: administration — managing group life schemes

Our client leads the global market in high-tech electronics manufacturing and digital media. The trustees of the company’s final salary pension scheme insure death-in-service lump sum and dependants’ pension death benefits for active employees, as well as dependants’ pension benefits for deferred members (those who have left service).

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment