View more on these topics

MM leader: Keydata saga has cost the industry dear

Natalie Holt website

The legal wranglings over Keydata have been going on for over four years now, following an investment collapse on a scale like nothing the industry had ever seen in June 2009. A staggering six years on, and neither the FCA nor Keydata founder Stewart Ford looks like they are nearing any form of closure.

This is not for the FSA and FCA’s lack of trying. The legal process has been protracted in the extreme, thanks to Ford’s judicial review of the FSA investigation and ongoing civil cases.

The Keydata founder’s latest attempt to stop the FCA from publishing a decision notice against him recently failed, but the case itself against Ford and former Keydata director Mark Owen and former Keydata compliance officer Peter Johnson is still working its way through the appeals process. It could be another year or more before the case is heard at the Upper Tribunal.

The FSA is not without responsibility in all of this, not just in being the ones to force Keydata into administration but its entire handling of the case (Money Marketing’s revelation that the regulator sent confidential, unencrypted information relating to the investigation to neighbours of Keydata directors springs to mind). Ford too, has questions to answer about whether he intentionally misled advisers about the products being high risk. If advisers sold the products without appropriate due diligence, they cannot be without reproach either.

The Keydata saga has done untold damage to advisers in terms of their reputation. But it has also hit advisers and the wider industry where it hurts the most – their pockets.

Quantifying the true extent of what Keydata has cost firms is difficult, but an illuminating exercise nonetheless. Out of a total £80m Financial Services Compensation Scheme interim levy in 2009/10, around £58m related to Keydata. Keydata Lifemark claims accounted for £247m out of a total £326m interim levy in 2010/11.

The FSCS itself has spent almost £16m in its legal challenge against Keydata advisers. Then there is the cost to individual firms who recommended Keydata products: a £6m fine for Sesame, an almost £14m legal bill for Chase de Vere, £57m set aside by Norwich and Peterborough Building Society. And that’s before you get to those firms who sold Keydata who have since defaulted.

My best guess, by no means definitive, puts the total cost somewhere around £398m. Suddenly the £75m fine the FCA is looking to hit Ford with somehow pales in comparison.

Natalie Holt is editor of Money Marketing – follow her on Twitter here


FCA logo glass 3 620x430

FCA seeks to fine Keydata’s Stewart Ford £75m

The FCA is seeking to fine Keydata founder Stewart Ford £75m and ban him from financial services. In decision notices published today, the FCA is also seeking to ban former Keydata sales director Mark Owen and former compliance officer Peter Johnson. The regulator wants to fine them £4m and £200,000 respectively. All three individuals have […]


Only 10 active cases left as Keydata battle hangs in the balance

Just 10 active firms remain in the Financial Services Compensation Scheme’s legal battle with advisers, after it reached settlements with all 15 lead defendants. In a statement on Keydata recoveries published today, the FSCS reveals it has recovered £52.4m from the proceedings against advisers, less £15.8m spent on legal costs. In total, it has recovered […]


FSCS recoups £52m through Keydata legal battle

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme has recouped a total of £52m through its legal battle against advisers who recommended Keydata products. In an announcement posted on the London Stock Exchange today, the FSCS says it has secured £122m in total recoveries relating to the collapse of Keydata. Once the costs of pursuing the recoveries is […]


Suffolk Life halts Sipp acquisition plans as director exits

Suffolk Life has stopped actively investigating acquiring other Sipp providers due to concerns it is too hard to weed out “unacceptable assets”. Strategic partnership director Chris Jones, who led the acquisition business, has decided to exit the company following the decision to focus on organic growth. The firm has made four acquisitions of Sipp back […]

The Perils of Passive Investing

The era of loose monetary policy created an environment that rewarded passive investors in the US. However, with the US raising interest rates for the first time since 2006, Felix Wintle explains why he believes active investing will be more important than ever. In the video Felix discusses: The rising cost of capital and its […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. This sorry saga is an indictment of the regulator and the concept of unbridled power in the hands of buffoons and industry-failures who have secured themselves a niche in an organisation famous for accepting applicants from the shallow end of the gene pool.

    The fact that advisers have been dragged into paying massive compensation when it was never due is beyond execrable.

  2. Julian Stevens 10th June 2015 at 1:21 pm

    A cornerstone of Ford’s fight-back is that the FCA, allegedly aided and abetted by PWC, should never have forced KeyData into administration in the first place and that HMRC denied KeyData an opportunity to rectify the issue of its apparent error in having marketed these products as qualifying for ISA status. All very messy and we may be certain that the FCA will impose on itself no ceiling on the amount (of OPM) it spends trying to defend its position.

Leave a comment