View more on these topics

MM Leader: Injustice of this unfair levy on advisers

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme went even further in its attempts to offend natural justice last week, confirming that intermediaries will pay the full burden of claims relating to Lehman-backed structured product providers.

The FSCS also confirmed it was to ignore the rightful outrage that greeted its original decision to place the full burden of complaints against Keydata on to the investment intermediation sub-class.

The £80m interim levy on intermediaries is over half the £148m sum the FSCS expects the entire financial services industry to pay in levies for the 2010/11 financial year.

Placing this levy on intermediaries is unfair and unjust. Keydata portrayed itself as a product provider and that was the way the FSA let it market itself.

This episode was principally a failure of FSA regulation, yet it is IFAs who have to clear up the mess.

The FSCS’s argument centres on the activities of Keydata. The firm did not handle client money directly or have discretion over bond purchases after receiving funds. Investment management was outsourced to investment vehicles Lifemark and SLS Capital and so in the FSCS’s eyes Keydata’s activities were that of an intermediary.

The logical conclusion of this argument is that responsibility for a huge number of firms we would consider to be at the riskier end of the market, and well outside the usual definition of an intermediary, would fall on advisers. Who will advisers have to bail out next?

The FSCS’s decision regarding NDFA, Arc Capital & Income and Defined Returns Limited is equally outrageous.

Again, these firms were portrayed and regulated as product providers who dealt with IFAs. NDF Administration and Direct Returns Limited did not even have intermediation as one of their FSA permissions. Yet, as with Keydata, the FSCS has lumped them into the intermediation sub-class when it comes to paying out claims.

The bills for this unfair levy have begun landing on the doors of adviser firms which are already struggling with the financial crisis and the retail distribution review deadline.

Meanwhile, many of those behind the companies that sold these products move on to their next venture.

The FSA and FSCS should be ashamed of this decision, which shows a lack of judgement and understanding of a market which has had just about enough.



The RDR plot thickens

We all need alternatives in life. For many years, I have had to digest and interpret trust and pension legislation and to save me going gaga I read at least one chapter a night from a crime novel. Some of these novels are formulaic, others have more of an unexpected twist. Last week’s publications by […]


Furore at pension commission split

Hargreaves Lansdown has slammed rival corporate advisers for providing rebates to employers at the expense of pension scheme members in a bid to win business. The company claims that a number of corporate IFAs have been recommending employers to transfer pension funds into new schemes earning the maximum commission of 30-35 per cent of the […]

One man’s actions

When James Bond started smiling less and doing fewer corny one-liners – essentially when Daniel Craig cloc-ked in for Casino Royale – there was a brief philosophical discussion on the sanctity of human life. Dryden, the crooked section chief, showing admirable sangfroid as he is about to become Bond’s all-important second victim, says: “Well, you […]

Scheme pays explained

By Fiona Hanrahan, senior product insight and technical support analyst We’ve received lots of queries on scheme pays and when it can be used. This article explains how it works and the conditions which apply. What is ‘scheme pays’? If an individual exceeds the annual allowance (AA) and an AA tax charge is due, they […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 7 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. What I dont really get is that if eg Keydata were NOT a provider, and NOt handling client money, then clearly its not THEIR failure which has caused the money to be lost? So surely its the failure of the institution where the money was held that ought to dictate the category applicable?…and surely that shoudl only apply if the product was a structured DEPOSIT rather than an invesmtent product..? or are ALL these claims automatically being assumed to have been “bad advice” by an IFA firm – and if so wouldnt the claim be against the IFAs many of whom are still in business and so not even fall under FSCS remit yet??…surely its only “bust” IFAs claims that go to FSCS, and surely no clients are arguing that it was Keydata that gave them advice??……im baffled

  2. Maybe whoever wrote this leader might like to form a rival body to AIFA? I’d join.

  3. Maybe whoever wrote this leader might like to form a rival body to AIFA? I’d join.

  4. Maybe whoever wrote this leader might like to form a rival body to AIFA? I’d join.

  5. This industry is beyond belief, human rights do not exist here.

    The public simply would not believe what is going on.

    Our clients are being forced to pay for this, not us.

    We do not need organisations in the format of AIFA, they need reducing to pure legal fighting machines, public PR machines and election funding.

    If a few hundred pounds each produces 10s of millions of pounds, then we could afford to be a main sponsor of a political party, afford barristers to contest every dubious request and still have change to have good PR on radio, TV and in the press.

    A simple format like the old small business forum, members vote on a subject and if it gets enough votes it is acted upon, except we could throw money behind it.

    We are fighting the wrong type of battle in debates, we need to put power behind us and start punching our real weight, we are the industry, we are not a small part of it.

  6. Join Adviser Alliance. If we join together we can fight this and other unfair diktats from the fsa.We need money to make our voice heard.
    individually we do not have the kind of money and power this would take.In the words of one of the powerful institutions”Together we are stronger”Stop moaning and do the maths a few thousand of us pooling together a few hundred pounds each could make a difference.

  7. We all disagree with the way we are being treated, but why are there 3 different institutions trying to get us all together to fight the likes of FSCS & FSA. Why don’t you all join forces i.e. AIFA, Regulatory Legal LLP nd Advisor Alliance. You should all have one voice. Pool all the fees together and we can take on the fight.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm