View more on these topics

MM leader: FCA must put its thinking Cap-ad on

The FCA’s decision to delay its up coming capital adequacy rules pending a fundamental review is to be warmly welcomed.

The rules, due to have been rolled out from December, required firms to hold the greater of four weeks expenditure or £15,000 by the end of 2013, rising to 13 weeks expenditure or £20,000 by the end of 2015.

Although the £20,000 minimum should not have been a huge problem for most small firms, the FCA’s expenditure based requirement would have had the perverse effect of penalising firms which had spent decent amounts of money on compliance, back-office systems and other staffing support costs.

The EBR would have also included the costs of PI Insurance, magnifying advisers’ exposure to any hardening of the market.

One firm we spoke to suggested its bill would have increased from £10,000 to £120,000 under the proposals.

In a note to trade bodies, the FCA says the proposals may not be consistent with the new regulator’s competition objective, presumably for some of the reasons outlined above.

The “fundamental review” should focus on whether these cap ad rules serve the purpose of protecting clients should a firm get into financial difficulty and work hand-in-hand with the regulator’s PI regime and Financial Services Compensation Scheme rules.

We have yet to see much evidence of the regulatory dividends once promised as part of the RDR. This could be one area were the regulator could look to introduce some risk weighting of firms in terms of the money that must be set aside.

Ideas could include lower rates for firms who stay away from more esoteric investments, which have caused so many problems in the past, or those with low levels of debt.

The FCA says it may need to take account of the European Banking Authority’s Capital Requirements Directive, meaning some tough negotiations could be required to ensure the particular needs of UK intermediaries are catered for.

The regulator must also ensure it listens and works closely with an advice profession which has been pointing out the flaws in these cap ad plans since they were first floated in 2008.

Advisers want a strong and sustainable sector with less likelihood of firms going bust and the inevitable FSCS bills which follow. Hopefully the FCA will listen a bit harder than its predecessor to come up with a set of rules to protect clients without penalising good practice.


Jupiter hits back at RedZone inclusion

Jupiter Asset Management has reminded investors “not to be swayed by short-term events” after one of its Merlin multi-manager funds was highlighted for poor performance. John Chatfeild-Roberts, Peter Lawery and Algy Smith-Maxwell’s £811.6m Jupiter Merlin Worldwide Portfolio was included in the most recent edition of Chelsea Financial Service’s RedZone report, which highlights funds which have […]


Michael Johnson: Aggregation could boost pension incomes by 13%

Centre for Policy Studies research fellow Michael Johnson says his radical plan to consolidate people’s pensions could increase retirement incomes by 13 per cent. Earlier this month, the CPS published a paper, titled ‘Aggregation Is The Key’, calling on the Department for Work and Pensions to abandon the proposed pot follows member reforms, whereby a […]

Damien Rylett IFP conf 2013 700 x 450

IFP conference 2013: The award winners in pictures

The Institute of Financial Planning has recognised its standout members at its annual conference at the Celtic Manor in Newport. IFP interim chief executive Steve Gazzard and IFP president and Dunham Financial Services managing director Rebecca Taylor presented the awards at last night’s gala dinner and at the conference yesterday. The winners are: Brunel Capital […]

Converting pension savings to a retirement income…

Since last year’s reforms to pension legislation, a significant number of retirees have chosen income drawdown over purchasing an annuity. Income drawdown is more flexible than an annuity. However, it also increases the likelihood that individuals won’t be able to maintain their income throughout their lifetime. In this short video, we explain the risks that […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. CA will not go away but my main beef with it is the balance sheet at the point that a firm gets into difficulty! In reality, the balance sheet for a firm in distress is not the same as when it was performing satisfactorily.
    Now there is a serious point to be made – please note MM. Under the old rules you could deduct shared commissions from your EBR. I guess that is why self employed advisers are a good idea. As it was intended from 31 December 2013 you would not have been able to deduct adviser charges. Commissions yes, adviser charges no. This needs to be noted when the inevitable consultation arrives.

  2. I personally favour a very different approach on this subject, but in terms of calculation, my understanding is that payaway to self employed is still ignored, regardless of Commission / Adviser charging. Non guaranteed bonus payments also do not count. So not as bad as some make out

  3. Phil – Payaway in the form of commission yes. Adviser charge – No.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm