View more on these topics

MM leader: Direct action against the claims firms

Lloyds Banking Group, a powerful but extremely self-interested voice, has joined the growing clamour against firms which incite spurious claims.

In a letter to justice secretary Chris Grayling, Lloyds chief executive Antonio Horta-Osorio calls on the Government to force firms to cover the cost of “invalid or bogus” Financial Ombudsman Service claims.

In response, the Ministry of Justice says it is looking to “minimise the burden” caused by unscrupulous claims firms and is in talks with the British Bankers’ Association.

It is worth remembering the growth in PPI claim firms is largely due to extremely poor claims handling from high street banks who invested significant sums trying to persuade those with valid claims to drop their complaints.

If the big banks had come clean and admitted their responsibilities earlier in the day there would be less claims firms competing for business. If they hadn’t dragged their feet with so many valid complaints the banks would not be suffering the recently introduced punitive £850 FOS case fees for PPI claims.

That said, it is good to see Horta-Osorio joining the huge number of IFAs and mortgage brokers calling for action against dodgy claims firms.

It is a depressing reality that the influence LBG carries in the corridors of power is far greater than a group of angry advisers.

The MoJ says it is beefing up its claims firm regulation with 200 firms recently shut down and a further 400 warned or suspended. However, far more needs to be done.

The Legal Ombudsman will soon be given powers to award up to £50,000 redress to consumers who believe they have been mistreated by claims firms.

But firms burdened with the costs of dealing with dodgy claims have no-one to complain to. These can be substantial costs for a small firm to stomach which may end up being passed down to clients.

As a result a number of advisers have taken matters into their own hands, billing claims firms for the time it has taken to deal with such complaints. As we have reported, a number have actually paid up.

Rather than waiting for the MoJ to get its act together, perhaps Horta-Osorio might consider following suit and charging firms for the time taken to deal with their dodgy claims. Direct action from advisers and the banks could be best way to clean up the claims farmers.

Recommended

1

FSA urged to avoid ‘myopia’ in annuities investigation

Pension experts say the FSA must avoid being “myopic” in its review of the annuity market by focusing solely on the rates offered by providers. Last week, the regulator set out plans to carry out a two stage investigation into the annuities market to make sure people are getting value for money from pension providers. […]

RBS investment head steps down ahead of Libor fine

The head of Royal Bank of Scotland’s investment banking arm John Hourican has stepped down ahead of the bank’s expected fine over its role in the Libor-rigging scandal. Chief executive of markets and international banking Hourican has reportedly given up a bonus pot worth £4m and will leave the bank with his minimum entitlement – […]

Sanlam UK sells 22% stake in Punter Southall

Sanlam UK has sold its 21.6 per cent stake in wealth management business Punter Southall in a management buyout, bringing the firm back under full independent ownership. Punter Southall has financial consultancy, investment management and actuarial consulting businesses. Sanlam UK has been the only external investor since 2001. Sanlam chairman Johan van der Merwe says: […]

5

Govt set to reveal details of £75k LTC cap

The Government is set to announce a £75,000 cap on the costs people pay for long-term care and an increase in the means-tested threshold from £23,250 to £123,000. Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt is expected to announce the plans for social care reform in a statement to the House of Commons today. Hunt is also expected […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. “Direct action” I suggest should be in the form of litigation for fraud against CMC’s that raise spurious and bogus claims which constitute deliberate attempts to extort money by deception.

    Surely the banks have the means to lead the way and a few well publicised victories against these criminal scumbags would send out a sharp message to all the others.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com