View more on these topics

MM leader: Deadline dogma risks wrecking success of RDR

Last week’s policy statement from the FSA failed to give platforms, providers or advisers the clarity they were craving as they look to change their business models in the run-up to 2013.

The FSA expressed its “desire” to ban both cash rebates between providers and investors and payments between fund managers and platforms, although it says more consumer research was needed before making a final decision. Considering the way the regulator has already flip-flopped its way through platform discussion and consultation papers, many firms will be loath to bet their futures on this being the final set of rules.

The FSA is also carrying out a guidance consultation on how to clear up the current headaches over defining what sort of business should fall under the FSA’s RDR legacy commission rules.

Given the huge potential impact of the platform fees and legacy commission rules on firms large and small, the FSA’s position that the RDR remuneration changes will still come into force on January 1, 2013 is becoming less and less tenable.

Understandably, much of the focus and energy behind calls for the FSA to be more pragmatic in implementing the RDR has been over the new qualification requirements.

The Treasury select committee has taken a commendable stance in calling for a one-year delay and a softening of the cliff-edge deadline in certain circumstances for experienced advisers.

However, in focusing too much qualifications there is a danger that other, potentially more worrying issues, are overlooked.

This week, Prudential joined Zurich in calling for a delay to the new remuneration requirements due to concerns that providers will not have time to get their systems in place by the current deadlines. Others have privately expressed similar concerns to Money Marketing.

With the continuing lack of clarity over platform fees, legacy commission and VAT, the arguments for the FSA to act are becoming more compelling.

When senior staff at the FSA decided on its January 31, 2013 deadline for introducing the RDR, we are sure they did not envisage a situation where, with less than17 months to go, so much has yet to be set in stone.

In continuing to stick to its arbitrary deadline the FSA risks undermining the admirable RDR goals for the sake of not losing a bit of face – hardly a positive consumer outcome.


Businesses to have living wills for crisis plan

Banks and big investment firms in the UK will be required to develop living wills setting out how they will cope if they hit financial difficulties without being bailed out by taxpayers. The FSA this week published consultation and discussion papers on its proposals for recovery and resolution plans. All UK-incorporated deposit takers, subsidiaries and […]

Pressure point

Markets are feeling distinctly uncomfortable at present. Running the agreement on the US debt ceiling to the wire hardly helped but the ongoing eurozone sovereign debt crisis has been adding to the angst. Then you have the growing belief that the US will slip back into recession. Shares are finding few friends right now. There […]

Fidelity to introduce no-commission shares

Fidelity has said it will introduce commission-free share classes across a range of mainstream funds ahead of the implementation of the retail distribution review at the end of next year. The UK’s second-largest retail funds group has already introduced shares with a new 1 per cent commission-free charge, or Y class, on funds aimed at […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. What about a compromise. IFAs stop complaining about the deadline for level 4, accepting that there is no reason why this should be delayed. In return, the FSA delay the inmplementation of charging rules for a year, to give everybody time to agree on, and implement, a workable system. That way, nobody loses (too much) face.

  2. I would agree entirely Charles but I think the FSA would love to launch the RDR to the public having achieved the three aims of the RDR at the same time. They would want to advertise the RDR as a complete package and anything less than than all three elements included would appear to be embarrassing especially as the most appealing element to consumers is possibly adviser charging.

  3. All this talk of delay and compromise reminds me of the eastern front in 1943.

    Everyday my generals were complaining about one thing or another – demanding to be allowed to retreat, to re-think our plans, to get things right before acting, to be more flexible.

    Well I showed them who was boss. No retreating, no change of plan, no compromise. Nurse is it time for my medication ?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm