View more on these topics

Miliband repeats call for pension ‘tax break’ reversal

Labour leader Ed Miliband has repeated calls for pension relief for higher rate tax payers to be capped at 26 per cent with the extra revenue spent on reversing cuts to tax credits.

Last month, Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls said by reducing the annual allowance from £255,000 to £50,000 instead of reducing relief for those earning over £150,000 to 20 per cent as Labour had planned, top rate tax payers had been given a tax break of £1.6bn. He said capping contributions to top rate payers to 26 per cent would fill that gap.

The sums behind Balls’ claims have been questioned by industry experts.

In a speech in Southampton this morning, Miliband said the Government should use the money to fund reverse cuts in tax credits set out in the Budget.

He said: “We say reverse the £1.6bn pensions tax break the Government has given to those earning above £150,000 a year and use the money to reverse some of the cuts in tax credits. I think that is what Britain would look like if we really were all in it together.”

When Balls originally made the call, Standard Life head of pensions policy John Lawson told Money Marketing the calculations behind Labour’s claim of a tax cut are wrong.

The previous Labour administration planned to limit pension tax relief for people earning over £150,000, including pension contributions, to 20 per cent from April 2011. Chancellor George Osborne instead cut the annual allowance from £255,000 to £50,000 and the lifetime allowance from £1.8m to £1.5m.

Balls claims Labour’s restrictions would have saved £4bn compared with the £2.4bn saving from reducing allowances. He says restricting relief to those earning £15,000 to 26 per cent would save £1.6bn, making up the difference.

Lawson says Balls’ figures for the cost savings associated with Labour’s original plans do not account for Government, employer, employee and pension scheme costs totalling between £2bn and £3bn.

He adds the £20,000 cap on annual allowances for top-earners in 2009/10 and 2010/ 11 created pent-up demand to carry forward contributions and reduced the initial savings from the annual allowance cap.

Lawson says the £2.4bn saving will be nearer the Treasury’s estimated annual saving of £4.5bn in future years.

He says: “Labour’s inefficient plan was already discredited last time round and it looks like they are putting it back on the table. They do not seem to have been listening.”

Recommended

14

Bamford: Industry must help kill off toxic investment products

A small number of advisers are spoiling it for the rest of us. Along with every other IFA firm in the UK, we got our invoice recently for the latest Financial Service Compensation Scheme interim levy. This goes towards paying compensation for the victims of such firms as MF Global, Keydata, CF Arch cru and […]

What advisers are saying- role of protection in IHT mitigation

Hands up who likes looking stupid? No, me neither, although the sub-text of my wife’s eyebrow, raised archly in my direction, is unquestionably “You could have fooled me.” She may have a point but I would argue there is a difference in the kind of stupidity that causes others a modicum of discomfort and the […]

Renaissance streamlines fund range

Renaissance Asset Managers is merging its £157.3m Eastern European fund into the £35m Emerging Europe fund. In December, the firm took over management of the Griffin Eastern European fund from Griffin Capital Management and rebranded it the Renaissance Eastern European fund. Renaissance chief investment officer Plamen Monovski runs both mandates. Renaissance UK sales director Ron […]

Thumbnail

Case study: administration — implementing a management log

Our client is a leading video game and publishing company best known for its console role-playing game franchises. The client provides a number of benefits, at varying levels and cost that attract a P11d liability. With the absence of a management log to track data for benefit movements, enormous administrative and therefore cost implications were occurring each year just to comply with P11d reporting requirements.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Letter to Ed;

    The cost of Public Sector Pensions now tops £1 TRILLION.

    How about cutting a few Billions from this to fund an increase in the nil tax band.

    OR

    The Quango bill is £100 BILLION. How about cutting this in half and use it to fund an increase in the nil rate band.

    OR

    How about calling all our troops home and funding an increase in the nil tax band.

    Rather than continuingly looking to hit hard working people’s private pensions

    Just a thought

  2. David Milliband 4th April 2012 at 1:11 pm

    Why doesn’t that goggle eyed twat just piss off?

  3. Labour can’t resist the opportunity to hit the pension funds as a way to plug gaps in their own economic plans. Pension saving needs to be encouraged before we end up forcing people to work into their eighties. Tax relief has been one of the best ways of encouraging pension saving to date. Why risk a successful approach rather than building on it to provide new ways, such as auto-enrolment, to encourage the spread of pension saving?

Leave a comment