View more on these topics

MEPs vote to reject €200 cap on adviser fees

MEPs have rejected draft rules which would have capped advisers’ fee rates as part of upcoming European packaged retail investment products regulations.

The European Parliament voted yesterday to exclude a clause which would have capped advisers’ hourly charges at €200.

The clause states: “When an hourly rate is charged, the total amount charged for providing advice shall not exceed €200.”

Apfa director general Chris Hannant says: “We have been campaigning hard on this and badgering MEPs across the spectrum.

“I don’t think price caps work full stop. It is not clear whether the cap would have been imposed on all financial advice or limited to Prips products, but it could have had a cataclysmic effect on advisers.”

He adds: “This is the parliament’s final word on it. The council has to approve its own version of the text and the two will then be reconciled, but I cannot see any member state putting forward anything as stupid as this.

“When the two versions are reconciled nothing new can be added so this should be the end of this proposal.”

In February Money Marketing revealed Economic and Monetary Affairs committee chair Sharon Bowles was pushing for a crackdown on “excessive” advice charges through Prips.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Why would the EU even contemplate this? It makes no sense, if someone is overcharging for thier service, the market will soon tell them.

    The FCA have always said theat they are not a price regulator, why cant the EU follow suit?

  2. Can someone fetch Nero and tell him to bring his fiddle along with him. The address? European Parliament

  3. Before anyone gets too outraged, I think this is a rare example of how demokratia is supposed to work. Politician proposes stupid idea; stupid idea is shot down by majority vote for being stupid; stupid idea goes away.

  4. Cap it at £50 with a penalty for poor performance.

    What value to advisers bring to the party?

Leave a comment