View more on these topics

May’s high pay crackdown abandoned

The Government has backed out of plans to introduce more binding votes on how top executives are paid, according to reports.

Prime Minister Theresa May remains committed to improving transparency on high pay as the Government lines up a paper on corporate governance next week, aides told the Financial Times, but others measures to rein in excessive packets are likely to be dropped.

Some investor groups had been calling for a threshold of 25 per cent of votes at an AGM to force company remuneration policies to be put to shareholders.

However, the Telegraph also reports that the need to introduce new legislation would be arduous for a minority Government.

A government official told the FT: “Our response will introduce reforms to make our largest companies more transparent and more accountable to their staff and shareholders and restore the balance between a company’s performance and executive pay.

“Our system of corporate governance is rightly held in high esteem but there is more to be done.”

The Government originally said it would consult on ways to better link performance to bonus payouts, as well as paying out share options to executives over a longer period to encourage longer-term thinking.

One idea that could make the paper is the publication of pay ratios showing the gap between executives and staff, which was floated by business secretary Greg Clark last year.

Significant names in the pensions and investment space have levied pressure on corporates over pay packages recently, including Standard Life and Royal London, which took on advertising giant WPP, while some investors called for a protest over Schroders chief executive Peter Harrison’s remuneration.



Shareholder rebellion among FTSE 250 companies doubles in 2017

The level of shareholder rebellion among FTSE 250 firms has doubled since 2016, research from the Investment Association shows. During the recent AGM season 29 companies received more than 20 per cent of dissenting votes, up from 15 companies in 2016. Furthermore, the number of votes against individual directors jumped 525 per cent from 4 […]


Hargreaves ditches Japan fund from Wealth 150

Hargreaves Lansdown has removed Paul Chesson’s Invesco Perpetual Japan fund from the Wealth 150 list of recommended funds due to its volatile performance. Chesson, head of Japanese equities, has run the £318m fund since 2000 and takes a high conviction, contrarian approach to investing. Investment analyst Dominic Rowles says that while this has led to […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. “However, the Telegraph also reports that the need to introduce new legislation would be arduous for a minority Government.”

    Hear that guys, if you wanted the Government to be tougher on big business you should have cast more votes for the blue team. What rot.

  2. Its not regulation needed to restrain Entrepreneurship of the Private Sector business, Regulation must be considered as soon as possible to restrict the Public Sector wages, the Public Purse must be restricted to no more than a single figure multiplication of the lowest paid within the same sector, so the Head of the FCA gets no more than 9 times the lowest employee of the FCA. After all, neither can be considered a Career

  3. Yes, total rubbish from May.
    Why would they want to crack down on big business? They are the ones keeping them in power. Just about!

  4. Being a synic, perhaps some people are looking for a new job. Not good to kill the Golden Goose!!

Leave a comment