View more on these topics

Maturity options on non qualifying policies

Under the current law, there is no tax charge when a policy matures if the policyholder exercises an option to re-invest all the proceeds of the maturing policy in a new policy with the same insurer. This relief, in section 540(2) ICTA 1988, in effect means that the time of chargeable event is deferred until the encashment or maturity of the new policy.

Some policyholders have used this rule in conjunction with the 5% tax-deferral rule to defer tax on the gain at maturity even when they have made part withdrawals before they exercise the option. Indeed, the policyholder could in theory withdraw more than the initial premium via the 5% rules without facing a tax charge because the 5% allowance would be based on two premiums – the premiums paid to effect the policy in the first place and the premium to the new policy on maturity of the first policy.

To counteract this a new measure is proposed which, subject to transitional provisions, will apply to policies which mature on or after 9 April 2003.

The proposed revision repeals the rule that allows the gain arising on the maturity of one policy to be deferred when all the policy proceeds are re-invested in a new policy under a maturity option. It ensures that the policyholder may never use the 5% tax deferral rule to withdraw more than the original premium without a tax charge.

A transitional measure ensures that policyholders who exercised a maturity option before 9 April 2003, or whose policy matures before 1 May 2003, may defer the gain on maturity provided the insurer retains all sums payable under the old policy on or after 9 April 2003 for re-investment in the new policy.

The Inland Revenue describe this as a simplification on the basis that there is no good reason for investors to have two different methods they can use to defer their liability to tax when they want to keep their money with the same insurer allowance.

They take the view that life insurance investors will, as now, be able to defer any tax liability until they obtain value from the policy by extending the policy term and so deferring maturity.



There is no surprise that the Budget contains little on pensions as major changes have been made to State pensions over the last year, while radical changes are presently under consultation with regard to private pension provision. The Government introduced the State Second Pension in April 2002, while the Pension Credit is due to be […]

North takes lead on property price rises

House prices rose by 1.1 per cent in March, according to the Halifax house price index.The figure is a fall from February&#39s 1.7 per cent increase. Halifax says the slowdown has been caused by an increase in the number of properties coming on to the market. For the first three months of the year, prices […]

Half of IFAs risking employee litigation

Nearly half of IFAs are risking employee litigation with 47 per cent admitting they don&#39t fully comply with all aspects of employment law according to a survey by law firm Peninsula. The survey showed more than half of those surveyed, 54 per cent, were taking short cuts and only 34 percent were aware of new […]

CGT avoidance

5.2.1 Second Hand Endowment Policies Two measures are proposed by the Government to combat the loss of tax by persons investing in traded endowment policies. (a) Avoiding CGT It is well known that where a person buys an endowment policy (a &#34second hand endowment&#34 or &#34traded endowment policy&#34) and that policy remains a qualifying policy, […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment