View more on these topics

Mark Barnett: Investing in unquoted companies

Mark-Barnett-MM-700.jpg

I am frequently asked about my intentions towards the unquoted companies held within my portfolios. While these look pretty large in absolute terms, in proportionate terms we are talking about some quite small segments of between 4.5 per cent and 6.5 per cent of the portfolio.

I remain of the view holding unquoted stocks in a long-term investment vehicle is the right thing to do. I also believe the optimal way to unearth unquoted investment opportunities is via the relationships we have established over many years with the “tech transfer” or intellectual property commercialisation companies, including IP Group, Imperial Innovations and Allied Minds.

These companies have relationships with a spread of academic institutions, as well as major pharmaceutical companies and the US federal government and, as such, have given us the opportunity to co-invest in new businesses with them.

We embarked upon a process around two years ago to encourage the move of some of the unquoteds, where appropriate, into the quoted sphere.

barnettgraphs

One such example was Circassia, a biotech company that came from the Imperial Innovations stable. Circassia is an allergy-platform business, which came to the market in March 2014. It was the first float of a biotech company on the London market since 2006 and the largest for over 15 years. The investments we have made over the past few years are now beginning to show the rewards of our patience. Since Circassia, we have also seen Allied Minds, Xeros, Abzena and Puretech Health float on the stock market.

One of our key strengths in the unquoted space comes from our dominant position as major shareholders in these IPC companies. The largest of these is Imperial Innovations, in which my portfolios combined hold a 42 per cent stake. We have 25.4 per cent in IP Group and 34.4 per cent in Allied Minds. We also now hold large stakes in quoted companies Mercia Technologies (29.5 per cent), Puretech Health (32 per cent) and unquoted businesses Cambridge Innovation (20 per cent), Oxford Sciences Innovation (16 per cent) and Eurovestech (30.3 per cent).

These relationships ensure the portfolios are better placed than anyone to benefit from the commercialisation of intellectual property. No one can replicate this position and we typically have the first option to invest in these companies at a relatively early stage in their life cycles. We will also potentially increase stakes over the life cycle, as milestones are met and as their funding needs for commercial development arise.

Not all our unquoted investments will be successful. It is inevitable some companies in the early stages of their development will fail to deliver as hoped. However, the major pricing improvement on float or trade sales that comes from those that do succeed can provide a significant uplift to portfolio performance. More importantly, their long-term future business value can also enhance performance if they are kept within our portfolios. This can prove particularly significant against a backdrop of the more modest capital returns I now expect from large-cap quoted companies.

Mark Barnett is head of UK equities and portfolio manager at Invesco Perpetual 

Recommended

2

The Hungerford games: Nutmeg chief searches for ‘killer app’

Nick Hungerford is every inch the 21st Century technology entrepreneur: young, cool, disruptive. In many ways, he is the antithesis of the UK financial services sector. But his journey to founding Nutmeg, the online investment platform attempting to tear strips out of the UK wealth management sector, has its roots firmly planted in the Square […]

Money-Cash-Coins-GBP-Pounds-UK-700x450.jpg

Advisers hit out over charge cap claims

Advisers have hit out at suggestions the FCA could intervene on adviser charging by imposing a cap on the cost of advice. Writing in this week’s Money Marketing, Adviser Advocate chief executive Richard Leeson says advisers need to address the discrepancy of percentage-based charging where wealthier clients pay more for the same advice service as […]

An open door for scammers?

Recent reports highlight that the Work and Pensions Select Committee of MPs are concerned about the potential for scams following the introduction of Pension Freedoms this year. This is a subject that we have already featured several times on the Jelf Blog, and one that we think is really important for employers (and of course […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment