View more on these topics

Malcolm McLean: Does CDC have a future in the UK?

The recent enquiry by the work and pensions select committee has reignited the debate about the future of collective defined contribution schemes.

Whether these sort of schemes can be incorporated into the current UK pensions landscape is a moot point. Let’s consider some of the arguments for and against CDC.

First of all, it is important to understand that CDC schemes differ from traditional DC schemes in that they do not produce individual pension pots. Instead, they invest in a larger collective pot, which provides an income to individuals during their retirement.

CDC schemes also differ from defined benefit schemes in the sense they do not guarantee certain incomes. Instead, they have a
target amount they pay out, based on a long-term, mixed risk investment plan.

CDC is not a magic bullet if your pension budget is too low. The first priority has to be to set aside enough retirement savings.

Will defined ambition pensions help planners?

CDC covers a wide range between DC and DB – some are more DC-like and some more DB-like. In the Netherlands, they have a range of models in operation but none are what we would call DB and very few are what we would call DC.

Collective investing and risk sharing between the members is expected to produce better outcomes for individuals overall, while employers stand to gain significantly by not having to shoulder the cost of making good large deficits in funding.

That said, critics are questioning how CDC will work with the introduction of pension freedoms – notably whether this would stymie the ability to take lump sums and/or transfer out prior to retirement. If this were to be allowed and people start to take out large sums of money, would this not weaken the shared pooling of risk and ultimately cause the scheme to fail?

‘Defined ambition’ pensions back on table with new MP inquiry

The proponents say not. With a CDC scheme, each person would have a share of the fund which would be their property right. This would be the same as a transfer value based on the benefits expected in the future, discounted back to the present (as CDC benefits are ultimately set by reference to the funds available).

Members would therefore be entitled at any point to transfer out right up to retirement (or even, in theory, post-retirement). That, they say, would allow pension freedoms to operate normally. However, if indeed that were the case, it would work better with a large scheme rather than a smaller one.

Looking beyond the technical and operational issues, it may be the attitudes and wishes of both sponsors and members that will determine the future of CDC.

Will there be much demand from employers, particularly those who have already moved to the safe harbour (for them) of conventional DC? Will members be comfortable about the possibility (unlikely as it may be) of having their pensions in payment cut back?

We shall no doubt find out in due course. Meanwhile, the debate
goes on.

Malcolm McLean is senior consultant at Barnett Waddingham



Keith Richards: The FSCS alternative staring us in the face

Unintended consequences of the pension reforms could further affect access to advice, ultimately derailing consumer freedom and choice. There is already evidence professional indemnity insurers are beginning to withdraw cover or harden terms for advisers associated with defined benefit transfers. But this is not a failure of PII. It is a more fundamental system failure, […]


RBS working on plans for standalone digital bank

Royal Bank of Scotland is mulling launching a standalone digital bank and has assigned a former top executive to the project, according to reports. Sky News says RBS’s former chief operating officer Mark Bailie is leading the “secret” project and that tens of millions of pounds have been assigned to creating the digital platform. The […]

Ros Altmann

Ros Altmann: Can industry fix damaged Isa brand before it is too late?

It has never been more important to encourage saving. But advisers know only too well how challenging the complexities of the UK savings and pensions landscape make it for people. Any trends towards simplification would be welcome, but unfortunately recent developments have moved in the opposite direction. Take Isas, for example. Their simplicity has always […]

State of the markets: global growth

In conversation with journalist Alexis Xydias, Artemis Global Growth Fund manager Peter Saacke discusses the state of global markets and how he is positioning his fund. Peter gives his views on the growth potential of US, Europe and emerging markets, each of which is on a different stage of the road to recovery. And with a […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment