What is a transitional serial interest? Is it important? And, if so, to whom and why?Transitional serial interests (TSIs) are defined in paragraphs 49B-E schedule 20 Finance Act 2006. They relate to trusts established before March 22 and, in connection with paragraph 49E, exclusively in connection with life policy trusts. The TSI provisions exist to preserve the pre-Budget IHT treatment for certain pre-Budget trusts in specified circumstances. The main TSI provisions relate to pre-Budget interest in possession trusts, and it is the provisions relevant to these trusts that I will be addressing in this article. If they apply, the value of the trust property remains in the taxable estate of the person(s) with the interest in possession for IHT purposes. First, it has to be said that while the life tenant (the person with the interest in possession) of a pre-Budget trust, (to which nothing other than permitted additions have been added), retains their interest in possession under the trust after March 21, that interest will remain taxable in the same way that it was before March 22. In other words, the discretionary trust IHT regime under chapter III part III IHTA 1984 will not apply. The capital value of the settled property supporting the interest in possession will be treated as being comprised in the taxable estate of the person with the interest in possession. If that person has their interest appointed away from them (terminated) after March 21 and before April 6, 2008, the person who secures the new interest in possession will be deemed to have a favourable interest in possession. This new favourable interest in possession will be a TSI. Such a TSI can only be created between March 22, 2006 and April 5, 2008. Most involved in IHT planning are aware of the opportunity to review IIP trusts before April 6, 2008 to determine whether a change of beneficiary before that date is worthwhile. Subject to the appointor’s requirements regarding who should benefit from an IHT standpoint, the appointment of a young beneficiary will give the maximum time for the trust to remain outside of the IHT discretionary trust regime. In order to qualify as a TSI, the settlement concerned must have been created before March 22, because the day before, the trust must have been one in which a life interest existed and the current beneficiary (the one claiming the TSI) must have become entitled to their interest on the coming to the end of the interest in possession of the person that had it immediately before March 22. It is the last condition that ensures that only one change of beneficiary is permissible after March 21 and before April 6, if the appointed interest is to qualify as a TSI. As well as avoiding the discretionary trust provisions, the settled property – where a TSI exists – will remain, for IHT purposes, in the estate of the person with the TSI. The termination of an IIP and the creation of a TSI will be a potentially exempt transfer, or an exempt transfer if the person who is the new beneficial owner is the spouse or civil partner of the person whose interest has been terminated. Of course, the termination/ appointment must take place before April 6, 2008. It will be appreciated that a TSI can be created actively or passively: actively where a power of appointment is exercised to change the interest in possession; passively where the life tenant dies and the trust terms provide for a successive life interest. The ability to create a TSI by exercising a power of appointment will be one that should be carefully reviewed by trustees of most life assurance-based flexible interest in possession trusts. This represents an excellent opportunity for advisers to review trusts that have the potential to benefit from the TSI provisions. A change of beneficiary should not be made just to create a TSI – the trust will remain outside the discretionary trust regime if the beneficiary who had the interest in possession before March 22 retains that interest. If a change of beneficiary is possible, it will be essential to review the trust before April 6, 2008. A pre-April 2008 beneficiary review will be essential, especially for trusts of significant single-premium plans (and thus greater potential for high-valued settled property). There are two other ways in which TSI protection can be secured. Both stem from the death of a person occurring on or after April 6, 2008. One is of general application, that is, to all trusts, and applies where a spouse or civil partner of a life tenant benefits. The other is applicable to life policy trusts only, and applies on the death of a life tenant, regardless of that person’s relationship to the succeeding beneficiary. More on these next week.
This week by personal finance reporter at The Daily Telegraph Faith ArcherMonday marked my first day back in the office after a week in New York celebrating an old friend’s wedding.
Prudential delivered a mixed set of interim results, with double-digit growth in UK retail sales offset by a fall in the wider group’s domestic business. The firm reports that UK retail annual-premium equivalent sales increased by 11 per cent to £485m over the first nine months of the year compared with 2005. This was buoyed […]
Forty-seven per cent of people eligible for NPSS would opt out,says a survey by JP Morgan Asset Management. Forty-nine per cent said they were unlikely to opt out and 4 per cent said they did not know.
‘Lack of explanation on the risks on income withdrawal can have dire consequences for clients in their retirement’
Jacob de Tusch-Lec, manager of the Global Income Fund, analyses a sell-off so “vicious” that the ‘hot’ stocks are underperforming emerging markets. What does it mean for the portfolio – now and in the months to come?
- Top trends
News and expert analysis straight to your inboxSign up
Latest from Money Marketing
Michael Klimes examines if advisers can resolve all drawdown issues themselves or if a wider effort is needed
Intrinsic must compensate a client for the pension transfer advice it gave them. According to a Financial Ombudsman Service decision, in 2015 Mrs C was told to transfer her two existing personal pensions valued around £80,000 to a new Sipp provider. This money was placed in a scheme where Mrs C could adopt a dynamic […]
“There is nothing permanent except change”, so said the “weeping philosopher” Heraclitus circa 500 BC. Few would argue change was not needed in the retirement income market; it is just no one expected it to be so inorganic and non-negotiable. The impact of the pension freedoms Budget bombshell in 2014 was immediate and significant. Revisiting […]