View more on these topics

Lost in the post: Employers challenge regulator over auto-enrol enforcement

Charles Counsell 700 x 450

Employers have questioned The Pensions Regulator’s enforcement action over auto-enrolment in 379 cases, new figures show.

In one example provided by TPR, an employer challenged a £400 fixed penalty because they said they had not received the notice as their post “was frequently delivered to the wrong address”.

However, the regulator rejected the appeal as it had a telephone recording where the employer confirmed it had received the notice.

The case was one of 379 reviews of statutory notices handed out by the regulator for breaches of auto-enrolment duties up to September 2015.

This is the first time details of the reviews has been made public.

Of these, 279 resulted in the notice being “revoked, substituted or varied”. This includes cases where a different breach has been uncovered and the regulator has decided to use a different power instead. TPR would not say how many reviews resulted in it dropping statutory notices entirely.

However, the regulator says: “Many of these appeals related to people who – due to a change in circumstance or because they were single person directors – did not employ anyone on their staging date. In these cases the statutory notice is usually revoked.”

In addition, six reviews were requested to be taken to tribunal. Of these two were resolved after notices were revoked, the tribunal sided with the regulator on two occasions, and two cases are ongoing.

The regulator’s latest quarterly compliance bulletin also shows it has now used its powers in 3,044 cases. This includes 582 £400 penalty notices and seven escalating fines, which range between £50 and £10,000 a day depending on the size of the employer.

TPR executive director of automatic enrolment Charles Counsell says: “Employers can avoid triggering a compliance notice by following the clear step-by-step information we provide on our website. This includes completing a declaration of compliance within five months of the date their duties went live.

“My message to employers is get your plans in place early, meet the deadline to complete a declaration to let us know how you have met your duties. Don’t ignore workplace pensions and risk a fine.”

Recommended

Lesley Titcombe

TPR clashes with FCA over retirement risk warnings limit

The Pensions Regulator has set itself on a collision course with the FCA after chief executive Lesley Titcomb suggested setting a £10,000 minimum for retirement risk warnings would be “problematic”. Earlier this month, the FCA announced a relaxation of the new ‘second line of defence’ rules. As a result, contract-based pension providers will only need […]

Pensions-savings-retirement-piggy bank

TPR mulls enshrining risk warnings in rules

The Pensions Regulator is considering pushing for its guidance on the new retirement risk warnings to be turned into law, Money Marketing can reveal. Unlike the FCA, TPR cannot set rules and must ask the Department for Work and Pensions to go further than issuing guidelines to trustees. New TPR chief executive and former FCA […]

Money-Cash-20-Note-Currency-UK-700x450.jpg

TPR hikes budget by 80% to meet auto-enrol burden

The Pensions Regulator is planning to dramatically increase its budget by 80 per cent as it prepares for millions of small firms to hit their auto-enrolment staging dates. Its 2015/18 corporate plan reveals it expects its 2015/16 budget to be £76m, rising to £106m in 2016/17 and £137m in 2017/18. This year’s budget was forecast […]

Scorpion-Predatory Arthropod Arachnid-Venom-Sting-700.png
1

TPR bans trustees who pocketed at least £130k through pension scams

Two trustees and a trustee company have been banned following an investigation into suspected pension scams. The Pensions Regulator has banned David Fellowes, Francine Becker and Avalon Pension Trustees Limited and appointed independent trustee firm Dalriada as trustee of nine schemes presumed to be used for scams. Fellowes and Becker told TPR Avalon had been […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Can’t they send that giant purple monster of theirs to devour the bosses not signing up their workers to a reduction in means tested benefits?

    For £8.5m you’d think it could at least make itself useful with some casual disembowelling.

  2. You ain’t seen nothing yet!

    The TPR is going to get so tied up in this sort of thing that either they will either have to take on significant numbers of extra staff, or they will take years to wade through their bureaucratic processes.

    But of course this won’t be widely publicised – after all we have to continue the spin about what a huge success AE is.

Leave a comment